157 Perceptions and beliefs of GPs on the CSPs 19. Brabers AEM DWN, Meijman HJ, De Jong JD. Wat beschouwen burgers als kernwaarden en kerntaken van de huisarts? Huisarts & Wetenschap. 2019. 20. Health Campus The Hague. Screening the CITY. 2018; Available from: https:// healthcampusdenhaag.nl/nl/project/screening-the-city/. 21. Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Extramuraal LUMC Academisch Netwerk (ELAN). 2020; Available from: https://www.lumc.nl/over-het-lumc/partners/partners-in-de-zorg/ extramuraal-lumc-academisch-netwerk-elan/. Accessed December 2022. 22. Benton SC, Butler P, Allen K, et al. GP participation in increasing uptake in a national bowel cancer screening programme: the PEARL project. British journal of cancer. 2017;116(12):1551-7. 23. Hermens RP, Tacken MA, Hulscher ME, et al. Attendance to cervical cancer screening in family practices in The Netherlands. Preventive medicine. 2000;30(1):35-42. 24. O’Connor M, McSherry LA, Dombrowski SU, et al. Identifying ways to maximise cervical screening uptake: a qualitative study of GPs’ and practice nurses’ cervical cancer screening-related behaviours. HRB Open Research. 2021;4. 25. De Nooijer D, De Waart F, Van Leeuwen A, et al. Participation in the Dutch national screening programme for uterine cervic cancer higher after invitation by a general practitioner, especially in groups with a traditional low level of attendance. Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde. 2005;149(42):2339-43. 26. Kant A, Palm B, Wentink E, et al. General practitioner based screening for cervical cancer: higher participation of women with a higher risk? Journal of Medical Screening. 1997;4(1):35-9. 27. Bertels L, van der Heijden S, Hoogsteyns M, et al. GPs’ perspectives on colorectal cancer screening and their potential influence on FIT-positive patients: an exploratory qualitative study from a Dutch context. BJGP open. 2019;3(1). 28. van der Velde J, Blanker M, Stegmann M, et al. A systematic review of the psychological impact of false‐positive colorectal cancer screening: What is the role of the general practitioner? European journal of cancer care. 2017;26(3):e12709. 29. Cook JV, Dickinson HO, Eccles MP. Response rates in postal surveys of healthcare professionals between 1996 and 2005: an observational study. BMC health services research. 2009;9(1):1-8. 30. Kelley K, Clark B, Brown V, et al. Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. International Journal for Quality in health care. 2003;15(3):261-6. 31. Lucassen P, Greijn C. How to read a qualitative research paper? Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde. 2018;162. 32. Panagoulopoulou E, Alegakis A, Mourad TA, et al. The role of general practitioners in promoting cervical cancer screening. European Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2010;19(2):160-6. 33. Giveon S, Kahan E. Patient adherence to family practitioners’ recommendations for breast cancer screening: a historical cohort study. Family practice. 2000;17(1):42-5. 34. Steenkamer BM, Drewes HW, Heijink R, et al. Defining population health management: a scoping review of the literature. Population health management. 2017;20(1):74-85. 35. Landelijke Huisartsen Vereniging. Driekwart huisartsen vindt werkdruk te hoog, 2022. Available from: https://www.medischcontact.nl/nieuws/laatste-nieuws/nieuwsartikel/ driekwart-huisartsen-vindt-werkdruk-te-hoog. Accessed December 2022. 36. Hersch, J.K., et al., Improving communication about cancer screening: moving towards informed decision making. Public Health Research & Practice, 2017. 27(3). 37. Herrera, D.J., et al., Mixed-Method Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Shared Decision-Making Tools for Cancer Screening. Cancers, 2023. 15(15): p. 3867. 6
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw