Chapter 1 30 51. McLarnon C, Johnson I, Davison T, et al. Resonance frequency analysis of osseo-integrated implants for bone conduction in a pediatric population - a novel approach for assessing stability for early loading. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;78(4):641-644 52. Lee JH, Frias V, Lee KW, Wright RF. Effect of implant size and shape on implant success rates: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Oct;94(4):377-81 53. Mendonça JA, Senna PM, Francischone CE, Francischone Junior CE, Sotto-Maior BS. Influence of the Diameter of Dental Implants Replacing Single Molars: 3- to 6-Year Follow-Up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Sep/Oct;32(5):1111-1115 54. Kruyt IJ, Nelissen RC, Mylanus EAM, Hol MKS. Three-year Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing a 4.5-mm-Wide to a 3.75-mm-Wide Titanium Implant for Bone Conduction Hearing. Otol Neurotol. 2018 Jun;39(5):609-615 55. Foghsgaard S, Caye-Thomasen P. A new wide-diameter bone-anchored hearing implant-prospective 1-year data on complications, implant stability, and survival. Otol Neurotol. 2014 Aug;35(7):1238-41 56. Nelissen RC, den Besten CA, Mylanus EA, Hol MK. Stability, survival, and tolerability of a 4.5-mm-wide bone-anchored hearing implant: 6-month data from a randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Jan;273(1):105-11 57. Nelissen RC, Stalfors J, de Wolf MJ, Flynn MC, Wigren S, Eeg-Olofsson M, Green K, Rothera MP, Mylanus EA, Hol MK. Long-term stability, survival, and tolerability of a novel osseointegrated implant for bone conduction hearing: 3-year data from a multicenter, randomized, controlled, clinical investigation. Otol Neurotol. 2014 Sep;35(8):1486-91 58. Palmquist A, Engqvist H, Lausmaa J, and Thomsen P. Commercially Available Dental Implants: Review of Their Surface Characteristics. J Biomater Tissue Eng. 2012;2(2):112-24. 59. Albrektsson T and Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 1--review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17(5):536-43. 60. Lagerkvist H, Carvalho K, Holmberg M, Petersson U, Cremers C, Hultcrantz M. Ten years of experience with the Ponto bone-anchored hearing system-A systematic literature review. Clin Otolaryngol. 2020 Sep;45(5):667-680. 61. Nelissen RC, den Besten CA, Mylanus EA, Hol MK. Stability, survival, and tolerability of a 4.5-mm-wide bone-anchored hearing implant: 6-month data from a randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Jan;273(1):105-11 62. Foghsgaard S, Caye-Thomasen P. A new wide-diameter bone-anchored hearing implant-prospective 1-year data on complications, implant stability, and survival. Otol Neurotol. 2014 Aug;35(7):1238-41 63. Kruyt IJ, Nelissen RC, Mylanus EAM, Hol MKS. Three-year Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing a 4.5-mm-Wide to a 3.75-mm-Wide Titanium Implant for Bone Conduction Hearing. Otol Neurotol. 2018 Jun;39(5):609-615 64. den Besten CA, Stalfors J, Wigren S, et al. Stability, Survival, and Tolerability of an Auditory Osseointegrated Implant for Bone Conduction Hearing: Long-Term Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Otol Neurotol. 2016;37(8):1077-1083
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw