Five year clinical outcomes and evaluation of the Oticon 4.5mm 49 2 References 1. A. Tjellstrom, Osseointegrated systems and their applications in the head and neck, Adv. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 3 (1989) 39-70. 2. L. Tietze, B. Papsin, Utilization of bone-anchored hearing aids in children, Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 58 (2001) 75-80. 3. J. Stalfors, A. Tjellstrom, Skin reactions after BAHA surgery: a comparison between the U shaped graft technique and the BAHA dermatome, Otol. Neurotol. 29 (2008) 1109-1114. 4. M.J. De Wolf, M.K. Hol, P.L. Huygen, E.A. Mylanus, C.W. Cremers, Clinical outcome of the simplified surgical technique for BAHA implantation, Otol. Neurotol. 29 (2008) 1100-1108. 5. S. Shapiro, J. Ramadan, A. Cassis, BAHA skin complications in the paediatric population: systematic review with meta-analysis, Otol. Neurotol. 39 (7) (2018 Aug) 865-873. 6. E.H.H. van der Stee, R.M. Strijbos, S.J.H. Born, M.K.S. Hol, Percutaneous bone anchored hearing implant surgery: linear incision technique with tissue preservation versus linear incision technique with tissue reduction, Eur. Arch. OtoRhino-Laryngol. 275 (7) (2018 Jul) 1737-1747. 7. M. H0gsbro, A. Agger, L.V. Johansen, Bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: randomized trial of dermatome versus linear incision without soft tissue reduction clinical measures, Otol. Neurotol. 36 (5) (2015 Jun) 805-811. 8. R.M. Strijbos, S.J.H. Born, S. Zwerver, M.K.S. Hol, Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: dermatome versus linear incision technique, Eur. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. 274 (1) (2017 Jan) 109-117. 9. P. Westerkull, The Ponto-bone anchored hearing system, Adv. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. 71 (2011) 3240. 10. J.H. Lee, V. Frias, K.W. Lee, R.F. Wright, Effect of implant size and shape on implant success rates: a literature review, J. Prosthet. Dent 94 (4) (2005 Oct) 377-381. 11. J.A. Mendon a, P.M. Senna, C.E. Francischone, C.E. Francischone Junior, B., S. Sotto-Maior, Influence of the diameter of dental implants replacing single molars: 3- to 6-year follow-up, Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 32 (5) (2017 Sep/ Oct) 1111-1115. 12. I.J. Kruyt, R.C. Nelissen, E.A.M. Mylanus, M.K.S. Hol, Three-year outcomes of a randomized controlled trial comparing a 4.5-mm-Wide to a 3.75-mm-Wide titanium implant for bone conduction hearing, Otol. Neurotol. 39 (5) (2018 Jun) 609-615 13. S. Foghsgaard, P. Caye-Thomasen, A new wide-diameter bone-anchored hearing implantprospective I-year data on complications, implant stability, and survival, Otol. Neurotol. 35 (7) (2014 Aug) 1238-1241. 14. R.C. Nelissen, C.A. den Besten, E.A. Mylanus, M.K. Hol, Stability, survival, and tolerability of a 4.5-mm-wide bone-anchored hearing implant: 6-month data from a randomized controlled clinical trial, Eur. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. 273 (1) (2016 Jan) 105--111. 15. R.C. Nelissen, J. Stalfors, M.J. de Wolf, M.C. Flynn, S. Wigren, M. Eeg-Olofsson, K. Green, M.P. Rothera, E.A. Mylanus, M.K. Hol, Long-term stability, survival, and tolerability of a novel osseointegrated
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw