70 Chapter 3.1 References 1. Tjellstrom A, Lindstrom J, Hallen O, et al. Osseointegrated titanium implants in the temporal bone. A clinical study on bone-anchored hearing aids. Am J Otol 1981;2:304–10. 2. Shah FA, Thomsen P, Palmquist A. Osseointegration and current interpretations of the boneimplant interface. Acta Biomater 2019;84:1–15. 3. Palmquist A, Omar OM, Esposito M, et al. Titanium oral implants: surface characteristics, interface biology and clinical outcome. J R Soc Interface 2010;7 (suppl):S515–27. 4. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, et al. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (I). Success criteria and epidemiology. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:527–51. 5. Dun CA, Faber HT, de Wolf MJ, et al. Assessment of more than 1,000 implanted percutaneous bone conduction devices: skin reactions and implant survival. Otol Neurotol 2012;33:192–8. 6. Bezdjian A, Smith RA, Thomeer H, et al. A systematic review on factors associated with percutaneous bone anchored hearing implants loss. Otol Neurotol 2018;39:e897–906. 7. McElveen JT Jr, Green JD Jr, Arriaga MA, et al. Next-day loading of a bone-anchored hearing system: preliminary results. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020;163:582–7. 8. Kruyt IJ, Nelissen RC, Mylanus EAM, et al. Three-year outcomes of a randomized controlled trial comparing a 4.5-mm-wide to a 3.75-mm-wide titanium implant for bone conduction hearing. Otol Neurotol 2018;39:609–15. 9. Wazen JJ, Babu S, Daugherty J, et al. Three-week loading of the 4.5 mm wide titanium implant in bone anchored hearing systems. Am J Otolaryngol 2016;37:132–5 10. Nelissen RC, den Besten CA, Faber HT, et al. Loading of osseointegrated implants for bone conduction hearing at 3 weeks: 3-year stability, survival, and tolerability. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016;273:1731–7. 11. McLarnon CM, Johnson I, Davison T, et al. Evidence for early loading of osseointegrated implants for bone conduction at 4 weeks. Otol Neurotol 2012;33:1578–82. 12. McLarnon C, Johnson I, Davison T, et al. Resonance frequency analysis of osseo-integrated implants for bone conduction in a pediatric population - a novel approach for assessing stability for early loading. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2014;78:641–4. 13. Lee JH, Frias V, Lee KW, et al. Effect of implant size and shape on implant success rates: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94:377–81. 14. Foghsgaard S, Caye-Thomasen P. A new wide-diameter bone-anchored hearing implant: prospective 1-year data on complications, implant stability, and survival. Otol Neurotol 2015;36:1123–4. 15. Nelissen RC, den Besten CA, Mylanus EA, et al. Stability, survival, and tolerability of a 4.5-mmwide bone-anchored hearing implant: 6-month data from a randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016;273:105–11.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw