177 General discussion 73. Goedhart N, Pittens C, Tončinić S, Zuiderent-Jerak T, Dedding C, Broerse J. Engaging citizens living in vulnerable circumstances in research: A narrative review using a systematic search. Research Involvement and Engagement. 2021;7:1-19. 74. Dimick JB, Ryan AM. Methods for evaluating changes in health care policy: the difference-in-differences approach. Jama. 2014;312(22):2401-2. 75. Cattan S, Conti G, Farquharson C, Ginja R, Pecher M. The health impacts of universal early childhood interventions: evidence from Sure Start. Institute for Fiscal Studies; 2021. 76. Clarke D, Méndez GC, Sepúlveda DV. Growing together: assessing equity and efficiency in a prenatal health program. Journal of Population Economics. 2020;33:883-956. 77. Alderwick H, Hutchings A, Briggs A, Mays N. The impacts of collaboration between local health care and non-health care organizations and factors shaping how they work: a systematic review of reviews. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:1-16. 78. Ndumbe-Eyoh S, Moffatt H. Intersectoral action for health equity: a rapid systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:1-13. 79. Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic evaluation: sage; 1997. 80. Ellehave SM, Thomsen LLH, Frederiksen MS, Overgaard C. Initial programme theory development: The first step in a realist evaluation of a cross-sectoral intervention for expectant Danish parents living with psychosocial risks. PLoS One. 2023;18(12):e0295378. 81. Gram P, Thomsen LLH, Andersen CG, Overgaard C. Trusting parent-professional relationships in interprofessional interventions for expectant and new parents in vulnerable positions: A realist evaluation. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2023:1-11. 82. White M, Adams J, Heywood P. How and why do interventions that increase health overall widen inequalities within populations? Social inequality and public health: Policy Press; 2009. p. 65-82. 83. Frohlich KL, Potvin L. Transcending the known in public health practice: the inequality paradox: the population approach and vulnerable populations. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(2):216-21. 84. Feijen-de Jong EI, Warmelink JC, van der Stouwe RA, Dalmaijer M, Jansen DE. Interventions for vulnerable pregnant women: Factors influencing culturally appropriate implementation according to health professionals: A qualitative study. PLoS One. 2022;17(8):e0272249. 85. Feijen-de Jong EI, Dalmaijer M, van der Stouwe RA, Jansen DE, Warmelink JC. Experiences and needs of women in vulnerable situations receiving additional interventions in maternity care: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):1-11. 86. Bradley EH, Curry LA, Ramanadhan S, Rowe L, Nembhard IM, Krumholz HM. Research in action: using positive deviance to improve quality of health care. Implementation science. 2009;4(1):1-11. 87. Scheefhals ZT, de Vries EF, Molenaar JM, Numans ME, Struijs JN. Observational Data for Integrated Maternity Care: Experiences with a Data Infrastructure for Parents and Children in the Netherlands. International Journal of Integrated Care. 2023;23(4). 88. Vanneste YT, Lanting CI, Detmar SB. The preventive child and youth healthcare service in the Netherlands: the state of the art and challenges ahead. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(14):8736. 89. Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJ, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A, et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific data. 2016;3(1):1-9. 90. Ministerie van Volksgezondheid Welzijn en Sport. GALA Gezond en Actief Leven Akkoord [Healthy and Active Living Agreement]. 2023. Available from: https://www.rijksoverheid. nl/documenten/rapporten/2023/01/31/gala-gezond-en-actief-leven-akkoord. 91. Geels FW, Schot J. Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research policy. 2007;36(3):399-417. 6
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw