85 Oral Health Interventions in Patients with a Mental Health Disorder Ethics and Dissemination This study did not require ethical approval, as data was collected from existing published peer-reviewed literature and grey literature. The protocol for this review was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42018114415). Results Literature Search The search yielded a total of 2081 publications as shown in the PRISMA Flow Diagram (Figure 1) [38–40]. After removal of duplicates and review of titles and abstracts, 1313 publications were screened for title and abstract. Of these publications, 102 publications were discussed with a third reviewer (N.B.). Finally, 16 full-text publications were assessed for eligibility. Of these, 11 publications were eligible for inclusion and synthesis. Inter-rater reliability for the title and abstract showed a 99.32% agreement with a k = 0.80, demonstrating a high agreement between both raters. Article Information With regard to the study design, four RCTs [45–48], six quasi-experimental studies [28,49–53] and one cohort study [54] were included. Four studies were conducted in Europe, three studies in North America and four studies in Asia. No qualitative studies could be included. The literature was analysed thematically and distinguished groups of mental health disorders for which the interventions were developed: severe mental illness (SMI) or not further specified, psychotic disorders, personality disorders, mood disorders, anxiety disorders, autism spectrum disorder, eating disorders, or substance abuse disorders (Table 1). Data was abstracted on article characteristics (author, total n, type of study, population, age, gender, type of oral health interventions, outcome, measurement instrument, assessment time), as included in Table 2. Data on research design and results (intervention/control group, intervention, comparator, results and effect) are summarised in Table 3. 4
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw