86 Chapter 5 ABSTRACT Objective: To assess the level of agreement between patient-reported pain using a standardized pain map and the physician-determined clinical diagnosis of Achilles tendinopathy. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Eligible patients were adults visiting a sports physician for symptoms in the Achilles tendon region. Patients completed a digital questionnaire and indicated one location on a pain map where they experienced their pain. The primary outcome measure was level of agreement (% and Kappa coefficient) between patient-reported pain on the pain map and the physician-determined clinical diagnosis (defined as localized pain associated with tendon-loading activities and pain on palpation with or without tendon thickening). The secondary outcome measure was the agreement between the location on the pain map (midportion/insertional region) with the clinical diagnosis of midportion/ insertional Achilles tendinopathy. Results: 110 patients (mean (SD) age 48 (13), 61% men) with pain in the Achilles region were included. In 102 (93%, Kappa = 0.86, CI 0.78-0.95) patients who indicated pain in the Achilles tendon region on the pain map, the clinical diagnosis of Achilles tendinopathy was made by the sports physician. 82% of the patients had the clinical diagnosis of tendinopathy in the specific region of the tendon they marked on the pain map (Kappa = 0.67, CI 0.54-0.79). Conclusions: There is almost perfect agreement between patient-reported pain on a pain map and a physician-established clinical diagnosis of Achilles tendinopathy. There was substantial agreement between the localization of the pain that was selected by the patient and the diagnosis of insertional/midportion Achilles tendinopathy by the physician. This tool could potentially aid in adequate triage for specialized care and for researchers performing large epidemiological studies.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw