47 Appreciating small-group active learning 22. Brown SR. Political subjectivity: applications of q methodology in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1980. 23. Stephenson W. Introduction to q-methodology. Operant Subj. 1993;17(1/2):1–13. 24. Watts S, Stenner P. Doing q methodological research: theory, method and interpretation. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications; 2012. 25. McKeown B. Loss of meaning in likert scaling: a note on the q methodological alternative. Operant Subj. 2001;24(4):201–6. 26. Ramlo S. Mixed method lessons learned from 80 years of q methodology. J Mix Methods Res. 2015;10(1):28–45. 27. Dotters-Katz S, Hargett CW, Zaas AK, Criscione-Schreiber LG. What motivates residents to teach? The attitudes in clinical teaching study. Med Educ. 2016;50(7):768–77. 28. Roberts JK, Hargett CW, Nagler A, Jakoi E, Lehrich RW. Exploring student preferences with a q-sort: the development of an individualized renal physiology curriculum. Adv Physiol Educ. 2015;39(3):149–57. 29. Young JM, Shepardson DP. Using q methodology to investigate undergraduate students’ attitudes toward the geosciences. Sci Educ. 2018;102(1):195–214. 30. Khatri R. Investigating students’ perceptions of e-learning within an occupational therapy program. Operant Subj. 2010;33(1/2):84–100. 31. Fokkema JP, Scheele F, Westerman M, van Exel J, Scherpbier AJ, van der Vleuten CP, et al. Perceived effects of innovations in postgraduate medical education: a q study focusing on workplace-based assessment. Acad Med. 2014;89(9):1259–66. 32. Berkhout JJ, Teunissen PW, Helmich E, van Exel J, van der Vleuten CP, Jaarsma DA. Patterns in clinical students’ self-regulated learning behavior: a q-methodology study. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2017;22(1):105–21. 33. Schmolck P. PQmethod [Internet]. 2014. Available from: http://schmolck.org/qmethod/ 34. Watts S, Stenner P. Doing q methodology: theory, method and interpretation. Qual Res Psychol. 2005;2(1):67–91. 35. Akhtar-Danesh N. An overview of the statistical techniques in q methodology: is there a better way of doing q analysis? Operant Subj. 2016;38(3–4):29–36. 36. Mattick K, Knight L. The importance of vocational and social aspects of approaches to learning for medical students. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2009;14(5):629–44. 37. Dinsmore DL, Alexander PA. A critical discussion of deep and surface processing: what it means, how it is measured, the role of context, and model specification. Educ Psychol Rev. 2012;24(4):499–567. 38. Watling CJ, Ginsburg S. Assessment, feedback and the alchemy of learning. Med Educ. 2019;53(1):76–85. 39. Jacobs JC, van Luijk SJ, Galindo-Garre F, Muijtjens AM, van der Vleuten CP, Croiset G, et al. Five teacher profiles in student-centred curricula based on their conceptions of learning and teaching. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14(1):220. 2
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw