62 Chapter 3 2. The stability of students’ appreciation for small-group active learning was further shown when we explored if students changed in correlation with their original profile. Table 3.2 shows the 18 participants at T2, who originally loaded significantly with one profile (two students did not load on a factor at T1). The mean correlation difference was -0.13, with a range of -0.36-0.07. The (very) weak negative correlation difference shows that most participants have changed little. Table 3.2. Correlation differences between T1 and T2 Correlation at T1 (2018) Correlation at T2 (2021) Correlation difference Profile 1: Understanding-oriented Participant 1 0.66 0.65 -0.01 Participant 2 0.62 0.56 -0.06 Participant 3 0.82 0.54 -0.28 Participant 4 0.79 0.71 -0.08 Participant 5 0.82 0.64 -0.18 Profile 2: Assessment-oriented Participant 6 0.67 0.62 -0.05 Participant 7 0.56 0.46 -0.10 Profile 3: Group-oriented Participant 8 0.73 0.67 -0.06 Participant 9 0.75 0.70 -0.05 Profile 4: Practice-oriented Participant 10 0.67 0.44 -0.23 Participant 11 0.78 0.68 -0.10 Participant 12 0.73 0.37 -0.36 Participant 13 0.65 0.55 -0.10 Participant 14 0.75 0.64 -0.11 Participant 15 0.54 0.35 -0.19 Participant 16 0.82 0.61 -0.21 Participant 17 0.65 0.72 0.07 Participant 18 0.77 0.48 -0.29
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw