Jan WIllem Grijpma

71 Changes in student appreciation of small-group active learning REFERENCES 1. Freeman S, Eddy SL, McDonough M, Smith MK, Okoroafor N, Jordt H, et al. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111(23):8410–5. 2. Onyura B, Baker L, Cameron B, Friesen F, Leslie K. Evidence for curricular and instructional design approaches in undergraduate medical education: an umbrella review. Med Teach. 2016;38(2):150–61. 3. Rocca KA. Student participation in the college classroom: an extended multidisciplinary literature review. Commun Educ. 2010;59(2):185–213. 4. Schneider M, Preckel F. Variables associated with achievement in higher education: a systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychol Bull. 2017;143(6):565–600. 5. Beament T, Mercer SJ. Speak up! Barriers to challenging erroneous decisions of seniors in anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2016;71(11):1332–40. 6. Frambach JM, Driessen EW, Beh P, van der Vleuten CPM. Quiet or questioning? Students’ discussion behaviors in student-centered education across cultures. Stud High Educ. 2014;39(6):1001–21. 7. Fredricks JA, Blumenfeld PC, Paris AH. School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Rev Educ Res. 2004;74(1):59–109. 8. Kusurkar RA, Croiset G, Ten Cate OTJ. Twelve tips to stimulate intrinsic motivation in students through autonomy-supportive classroom teaching derived from self-determination theory. Med Teach. 2011;33(12):978–82. 9. Long D. Theories and models of student development. In: L. J. Hinchliffe, M. A. Wong, editors. Environments for student growth and development: librarians and student affairs in collaboration. Chicago, IL: Association of College & Research Libraries; 2012. p. 41–55. 10. Mintzes JJ, Walter EM. Active learning in college science: the case for evidence-based practice. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland AG; 2020. 11. Patton LD, Renn KA, Guido-DiBrito F, Quaye SJ. Student development in college: theory, research, and practice. Third edition. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass & Pfeiffer; 2016. 12. Grijpma JW, de la Croix A, Kleinveld JH, Meeter M, Kusurkar RA. Appreciating small-group active learning: what do medical students want, and why? A q-methodology study. Med Teach. 2021;43(4):411–20. 13. Bucklin BA, Asdigian NL, Hawkins JL, Klein U. Making it stick: use of active learning strategies in continuing medical education. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21:44. 14. Luc JGY, Antonoff MB. Active learning in medical education: application to the training of surgeons. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2016;3:51–6. 15. Sandrone S, Berthaud JV, Carlson C, Cios J, Dixit N, Farheen A, et al. Active learning in psychiatry education: current practices and future perspectives. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:211. 16. Wolff M, Wagner MJ, Poznanski S, Schiller J, Santen S. Not another boring lecture: engaging learners with active learning techniques. J Emerg Med. 2015;48(1):85–93. 17. Asikainen H, Gijbels D. Do students develop towards more deep approaches to learning during studies? A systematic review on the development of students’ deep and surface approaches to learning in higher education. Educ Psychol Rev. 2017;29(2):205–34. 18. Eastwood JL, Koppelman-White E, Mi M, Wasserman JA, Krug Iii EF, Joyce B. Epistemic cognition in medical education: a literature review. Int J Med Educ. 2017;8:1–12. 19. Hofer BK, Pintrich PR. The development of epistemological theories: beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Rev Educ Res. 1997;67(1):88–140. 3

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw