94 Chapter 4 REFERENCES 1. Irby DM, Wilkerson L. Educational innovations in academic medicine and environmental trends. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(5):370–6. 2. Mann KV. Theoretical perspectives in medical education: past experience and future possibilities. Med Educ. 2011;45(1):60–8. 3. Spencer JA, Jordan RK. Learner centred approaches in medical education. Br Med J. 1999;318(7193):1280–3. 4. Kilgour JM, Grundy L, Monrouxe LV. A rapid review of the factors affecting healthcare students’ satisfaction with small-group, active learning methods. Teach Learn Med. 2016;28(1):15–25. 5. Onyura B, Baker L, Cameron B, Friesen F, Leslie K. Evidence for curricular and instructional design approaches in undergraduate medical education: an umbrella review. Med Teach. 2016;38(2):150–61. 6. Inra JA, Pelletier S, Kumar NL, Barnes EL, Shields HM. An active learning curriculum improves fellows’ knowledge and faculty teaching skills. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017;8:359–64. 7. Lim J, Ko H, Yang JW, Kim S, Lee S, Chun MS, et al. Active learning through discussion: ICAP framework for education in health professions. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):477. 8. Walling A, Istas K, Bonaminio GA, Paolo AM, Fontes JD, Davis N, et al. Medical student perspectives of active learning: a focus group study. Teach Learn Med. 2017;29(2):173–80. 9. White C, Bradley E, Martindale J, Roy P, Patel K, Yoon M, et al. Why are medical students ‘checking out’ of active learning in a new curriculum? Med Educ. 2014;48(3):315–24. 10. Edmunds S, Brown G. Effective small group learning: AMEE guide no. 48. Med Teach. 2010;32(9):715–26. 11. Prince M. Does active learning work? A review of the research. J Eng Educ. 2004;93(3):223–31. 12. Yew EHJ, Goh K. Problem-based learning: an overview of its process and impact on learning. Health Prof Educ. 2016;2(2):75–9. 13. Albanese MA, Mitchell S. Problem-based learning: a review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Acad Med. 1993;68(1):52–81. 14. McLean SF. Case-based learning and its application in medical and health-care fields: a review of worldwide literature. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2016;3:39–49. 15. Thistlethwaite JE, Davies D, Ekeocha S, Kidd JM, MacDougall C, Matthews P, et al. The effectiveness of case-based learning in health professional education. A BEME systematic review: BEME guide no. 23. Med Teach. 2012;34(6):e421–44. 16. Sisk RJ. Team-based learning: systematic research review. J Nurs Educ. 2011;50(12):665–9. 17. Reimschisel T, Herring AL, Huang J, Minor TJ. A systematic review of the published literature on team-based learning in health professions education. Med Teach. 2017;39(12):1227–37. 18. Fatmi M, Hartling L, Hillier T, Campbell S, Oswald AE. The effectiveness of team-based learning on learning outcomes in health professions education: BEME guide no. 30. Med Teach. 2013;35(12):e1608-24. 19. Hattie J. Visible learning for teachers: maximizing impact on learning. Oxfordshire, United Kingdom: Routledge; 2012. 20. Schneider M, Preckel F. Variables associated with achievement in higher education: a systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychol Bull. 2017;143(6):565–600. 21. Michael J. Where’s the evidence that active learning works? Adv Physiol Educ. 2006;30(4):159– 67. 22. Rocca KA. Student participation in the college classroom: an extended multidisciplinary literature review. Commun Educ. 2010;59(2):185–213. 23. Chi MTH, Wylie R. The ICAP framework: linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educ Psychol. 2014;49(4):219–43.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw