APPENDIX I Table 5: Participant Demographics Sex Age Years of experience/ residency Lap experience Metabolic bariatric experience Lap bowel measurement Surgeon 1 Male 46 11 > 3000 > 2000 > 1500 Surgeon 2 Male 43 11 > 3000 > 2000 > 1500 Surgeon 3 Female 45 10 > 3000 > 2000 > 1500 Surgeon 4 Female 36 5 > 1000 > 500 > 500 Resident 1 Male 34 3 50 - 100 - 10 - 20 Resident 2 Male 32 1 1 - 10 - 1 - 10 Resident 3 Male 30 1 10 - 50 - 0 Resident 4 Female 32 2 1 - 10 - 1 - 10 Lap experience = laparoscopic experience expressed as number of laparoscopic surgeries; Lap bowel measurement = laparoscopic bowel measurement expressed as number of performed laparoscopic bowel measurements. Table 6: Inter-individual Difference Between Metabolic Bariatric Surgeons MBS surgeon 2 MBS surgeon 3 MBS surgeon 4 Es2mate P-value Es2mate P-value Es2mate P-value MBS surgeon 1 150 cm -18 0.01 -17 0.02 -18 0.01 180 cm -33 0.0001 -13 0.04 -15 0.01 210 cm -22 0.004 -16 0.02 -21 0.002 MBS surgeon 2 150 cm 1 0.84 0.3 0.95 180 cm 20 0.006 18 0.01 210 cm 6 0.31 1 0.87 MBS surgeon 3 150 cm -1 0.85 180 cm -2 0.71 210 cm -5 0.31 Dependent variable: percentage deviajon (%). Esjmates of each metabolic bariatric surgeon individually were compared to analyze the inter-individual differences. 128 6
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw