Public support for smoke-free policies in outdoor areas and (semi-) private places: a systematic review and meta-analysis 131 4 Author (year) Geographic location Smoke-free location Support measure Answer options Overall sample size Reported support overall Support transformed, reversed etc. Burns (2013) Perth (Australia) College campus Our campus should be smoke-free including all outdoor areas Agree (agree, strongly agree); neutral; disagree (disagree, strongly disagree) n = 589 60.8% 60.8% Burns (2013) Perth (Australia) College campus Our campus should be completely smoke free Agree (agree, strongly agree); neutral; disagree (disagree, strongly disagree) n = 636 65.7% 65.7% Cartanyà-Hueso (2019) Barcelona (Spain) Outdoor areas of universities Should smoking be prohibited at outdoor areas of universities? Yes (agree, totally agree); no (neutral, disagree, totally disagree) n = 736 57.7% 57.7% Chaaya (2021) Beirut (Lebanon) University Campus Students were asked to indicate the extent to which they supported the policy Agree (large extent, some extent); not agree (not at all, not sure) Pre-ban: n = 809 Post-ban: n = 615 See subgroup smoking status Pre-ban: 62.7% Post-ban: 83.7% El Ansari (2012a) Egypt University Campus There should be no smoking on the university premises at all Agree (agree, strongly agree); disagree (neutral, disagree, strongly disagree) n = 3258 87.3% 87.3% El Ansari (2012b) UK, Wales, Northern Ireland University Campus There should be no smoking on the university premises at all Agree (agree, strongly agree); disagree (neutral, disagree, strongly disagree) n = 3706 45.3% 45.3%
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw