Public support for smoke-free policies in outdoor areas and (semi-) private places: a systematic review and meta-analysis 183 4 Author (year) Description of policy Implementation date Implementation level Enforcement Observational period Selection of participants Wallar (2013) Support for hypothetical policies - - - November 19 to 30, 2012 In person recruitment at neutral, high student volume places on campus Walsh (2008) Support for hypothetical policies - - - October to December 2004 New Zealand households selected through New South Wales Electronic White Pages, quotas were applied to increase the representativeness of the sample and data were weighted to the NSW population. Letters were sent to 12,000 addresses of which 4,859 (40.5%) proved to be businesses or were ineligible for other reasons. Wang (2018) US Department of Housing and Urban development rule requiring US public housing agencies (PHA) to implement a smoke free policy February 3, 2017 National Law required PHA to have policies, enforcement is up to PHA 2016 (18 months prior to rule) US adults age 18 and older, random sampling through address based probability sampling. Data are weighted to be nationally representative and match US current population survey proportions of nine demographic variables Wheeler (2007)University of Ankara for Medical Sciences (UAMS) smoke-free campus policy July 4, 2004 Local Compliance would be the responsibility of administrators with security personnel as back up April 2004 and May 2005 The personnel roster from human resources was used to randomly sample 1,400 from approximately 9,000 employees without replacement. Wiliams (2011) Support for hypothetical policies - - - Two-weeks in fall 2008 and two weeks in fall 2009 Six high traffic locations on campus, during mid-day on all five days of the week
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw