Deposit? Yes, please! The effect of different modes of assigning reward-and deposit-based financial incentives on effort 315 9 Table B1: Continued Model 0 Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5 Sample Both arms Both arms Only random Only nudged Only depositbased Only rewardbased Persistence β p-value β p-value β p-value β p-value β p-value β p-value Earnings Intercept 922.6 .001 273.1 .202 243.4 .467 776.8 .003 377.8 .364 186.4 .392 Nudged assignment 156.3 .042 283.5 .086 67.6 .359 Payment condition €12 282.2 .003 312.5 .032 306.5 .008 217.1 .364 328.3 .000 Payment condition €20 1006.3 .000 902.2 .000 1248.5 .000 888.7 .000 1122.8 .000 Deposit scheme -197.8 .095 -74.1 .440 Gender (ref. male) 60.7 .540 137.4 .066 225.7 .048 2.2 .980 111.1 .464 149.5 .042 Income -17.8 .406 -22.9 .169 -20.9 .373 19.4 .4 -15.2 .651 -10.2 .0577 Model0: Effect of personal characteristics persistence and earnings Model1: Effect of choice on persistence and earnings corrected for personal characteristics Model2: Effect of deposit incentives on persistence and earnings when it is not a choice corrected for personal characteristics Model3: Effect of deposit incentives on persistence and earnings when it is a choice corrected for personal characteristics Model 4: Effect of choice on persistence and earnings among those who have a deposit-based incentive scheme corrected for personal characteristics Model 5: Effect of choice on persistence and earnings among those who have a reward-based incentive scheme corrected for personal characteristics
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw