Assessing public support for extending smoke-free policies beyond enclosed public places and workplaces: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 71 3 18. Fong GT, Hyland A, Borland R, Hammond D, Hastings G, McNeill A, et al. Reductions in tobacco smoke pollution and increases in support for smoke-free public places following the implementation of comprehensive smoke-free workplace legislation in the Republic of Ireland: findings from the ITC Ireland/UK Survey. Tob Control. 2006;15(suppl 3):iii51. 19. Fabian LE, Bernat DH, Lenk KM, Shi Q, Forster JL. Smoke-free laws in bars and restaurants: does support among teens and young adults change after a statewide smoke-free law? Public Health Rep. 2011;126(5):669-76. 20. Thomson G, Wilson N. One year of smokefree bars and restaurants in New Zealand: impacts and responses. BMC Public Health. 2006;6(1):64. 21. Kuijpers TG, Willemsen MC, Kunst AE. Public support for tobacco control policies: The role of the protection of children against tobacco. Health Policy. 2018;122(8):929-35. 22. Rozema AD, Mathijssen JJP, Jansen MWJ, van Oers JAM. Schools as smoke-free zones? Barriers and facilitators to the adoption of outdoor school ground smoking bans at secondary schools. Tob Induc Dis. 2016;14(1):10. 23. World Health Organization. Protection from exposure to second-hand tobacco smoke: policy recommendations. 2007. 24. Cochran WG. Sampling Technique. John Wiley and Son. New York. 1977. 25. Bartlett JE, Kotrlik JW, Higgins CCH. Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research appropriate sample size in survey research. Inf Technol J. 2001;19(1):8. 26. Vital Strategies. Crooked Nine: Nine Ways the Tobacco Industry Undermines Health Policy. New York, NY 2019. 27. Bramer WM. Reference checking for systematic reviews using Endnote. J Med Libr Assoc. 2018;106(4):542-6. 28. Bramer WM, Giustini D, de Jonge GB, Holland L, Bekhuis T. De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote. J Med Libr Assoc. 2016;104(3):240-3. 29. World Bank. Country Classification In: Group TWB, editor. 2019. 30. Hong QN, Pluye P, Fàbregues S, Bartlett G, Boardman F, Cargo M, et al. Mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT), version 2018. IC Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Industry Canada. 2018. 31. Wang N. How to Conduct a Meta-Analysis of Proportions in R: A Comprehensive Tutorial2018. 32. Nyaga VN, Arbyn M, Aerts M. Metaprop: a Stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial data. Arch Public Health. 2014;72(1):39. 33. Van den Noortgate W, Lopez-Lopez JA, Marin-Martinez F, Sanchez-Meca J. Three-level meta-analysis of dependent effect sizes. Behav Res Methods. 2013;45(2):576-94. 34. Assink M, Wibbelink CJM. Fitting three-level meta-analytic models in R: A step-by-step tutorial. Quant Method Psychol. 2016;12(3):154-74. 35. Schwarzer G. meta: An R package for meta-analysis. R news. 2007;7(3):40-5. 36. Viechtbauer W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J Stat Softw. 2010;36(3):1-48. 37. Borenstein M, Higgins JPT. Meta-analysis and subgroups. Prev Sci. 2013;14(2):134-43. 38. Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:45. 39. Eykelenboom M, van Stralen MM, Olthof MR, Schoonmade LJ, Steenhuis IHM, Renders CM, et al. Political and public acceptability of a sugar-sweetened beverages tax: a mixedmethod systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019;16(1):78.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw