Martijn Sijbom

73 Determinants of inappropriate antibiotic prescription in primary care in developed countries with general practitioners as gatekeepers 3 Section and Topic Item # Checklist item Location where item is reported Synthesis methods 13a Describe the processes used to decide which studies were eligible for each synthesis (e.g. tabulating the study intervention characteristics and comparing against the planned groups for each synthesis (item #5)). Page 7, 8 13b Describe any methods required to prepare the data for presentation or synthesis, such as handling of missing summary statistics, or data conversions. Page 8, 9 13c Describe any methods used to tabulate or visually display results of individual studies and syntheses. Page 8, 9 13d Describe any methods used to synthesize results and provide a rationale for the choice(s). If meta-analysis was performed, describe the model(s), method(s) to identify the presence and extent of statistical heterogeneity, and software package(s) used. Page 8,9 13e Describe any methods used to explore possible causes of heterogeneity among study results (e.g. subgroup analysis, meta-regression). NA 13f Describe any sensitivity analyses conducted to assess robustness of the synthesized results. NA Reporting bias assessment 14 Describe any methods used to assess risk of bias due to missing results in a synthesis (arising from reporting biases). Page 8 Certainty assessment 15 Describe any methods used to assess certainty (or confidence) in the body of evidence for an outcome. Page 8 RESULTS Study selection 16a Describe the results of the search and selection process, from the number of records identified in the search to the number of studies included in the review, ideally using a flow diagram. Page 10, figure 1 16b Cite studies that might appear to meet the inclusion criteria, but which were excluded, and explain why they were excluded. NA Study characteristics 17 Cite each included study and present its characteristics. Supplement 6 Risk of bias in studies 18 Present assessments of risk of bias for each included study. Supplement 7 and 8 Results of individual studies 19 For all outcomes, present, for each study: (a) summary statistics for each group (where appropriate) and (b) an effect estimate and its precision (e.g. confidence/credible interval), ideally using structured tables or plots. Supplement 6

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw