158 Chapter 2 Figure A.7 Forest plot of standardised effect sizes of studies examining anxiety symptoms Beidel et al. 2021 Dennis et al. 2021 Khanna & Kendall, 2010 Schoneveld et al. 2018 Schuurmans et al. 2018 Schuurmans, Nijhof, Popma et al. 2021 Tsui et al. 2021 Haberkamp et al. 2021 Khanna & Kendall, 2010 Scholten et al. 2016 Schoneveld et al. 2016 Wijnhoven et al. 2020 Knox et al. 2011 McCashin et al., 2022 Khanna & Kendall, 2010 Applied game vs Active condition Applied game vs Casual game Applied game vs Passive condition Active condition vs Casual games Cohen's d [95% CI] 1.77 [0.99, 2.55] 0.00 [-0.64, 0.64] 0.05 [-0.64, 0.73] 0.03 [-0.30, 0.36] 0.14 [-0.52, 0.79] 0.20 [-0.26, 0.67] 0.12 [-0.27, 0.50] 0.46 [-0.05, 0.96] 0.27 [-0.43, 0.96] 0.11 [-0.22, 0.45] 0.43 [0.07, 0.78] 0.14 [-0.24, 0.51] 1.31 [0.43, 2.19] 0.25 [-0.19, 0.69] 0.22 [-0.47, 0.90] -0.75 -0.50 -0.25 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75 Favours comparison group Favours applied game / active condition Anxiety symptoms Notes. Scholten et al. (2016) report a Cohen’s d of 0.02 (controlled for clustering and baseline anxiety) and McCashin et al. (2022) a Cohen’s d of 0.26, with 95% CI [0.01, 0.11]. CI = confidence interval.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw