Jasper Faber

Chapter 6 112 Abstract Background | Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) shows lower effectiveness and higher dropouts among people with a low socioeconomic position (SEP) compared to those with a high SEP. Objective | This study evaluated an eHealth intervention aimed at supporting patients with a low SEP during their waiting period preceding CR. Methods | Participants with a low SEP in their waiting period before CR were randomized into an intervention group, receiving guidance videos, patient narratives, and practical tips, or into a control group. We evaluated adherence (usage metrics), acceptance (modified USE questionnaire), and changes in feelings of certainty and guidance between the waiting period’s start and end. Semi-structured interviews provided complementary insights. Results | The study involved 41 participants (median (IQR) age 62 (14) years; 33 males), with 21 participants allocated to the intervention group, using the eHealth intervention for a median (IQR) duration of 16 (10) days, using it on a median (IQR) of 100% (25) of these days, and viewing 88% of the available messages. Key adherence themes were daily routine compatibility and curiosity. Acceptance rates were 86% for usability, 67% for satisfaction, and 43% for usefulness. No significant effects on certainty and guidance were observed, but qualitative data suggested that the intervention helped to inform and set expectations. Conclusion | The study found the eHealth intervention feasible for cardiac patients with a low SEP, with good adherence, usability, and satisfaction. However, it showed no effect on feelings of certainty and guidance. Through further optimization of its content, the intervention holds promise to improve emotional resilience during the waiting period.

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw