182 Findings from study 1 (Delphi study) Findings from Study 2 (Attitude profiles study) Associations between study 1 and study 2 Engagement (Refers to methods or strategies that encourage people with a low SEP to participate in evaluation studies) (-) Encumbered Concerned Indifferent Detached /Loyal Encumbered: 1. Has a difficult life situation and, therefore, is not eager to participate in evaluation studies. 2. Has a difficult life situation and, therefore, thinking about investments for (future) health has limited priority. Concerned: Becomes motivated by setting and achieving goals. Indifferent: Does not see why eHealth is better than traditional approaches and, therefore, considers it not worth the effort. Detached: Has a lack of trust toward healthcare professionals and researchers. Loyal: Values a personal, face-to-face approach with (healthcare) professionals. Evaluation methods (refers to the evaluation methods used to evaluate the eHealth intervention) (+) Disadvantaged Disadvantaged: Written materials are too difficult to understand. Implementation Motivation (refers to persuading professionals to implement an eHealth intervention in practice) (+) Hesitating Hesitating: If professionals themselves are competent and enthusiastic about eHealth, it can be effective in hesitant groups (+) = facilitator, (-) = barrier The conception of this table involved two authors independently examining the interplay between barriers and facilitators from the Delphi study and profiles from the attitude profile study. Discrepancies and alignments were discussed, categorized, and ultimately synthesized into this final table. Appendix 4A – Continued
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw