4 Guide development for eHealth interventions targeting people with a low socioeconomic position 77 Background information was analyzed using descriptive summary statistics. Quantitative data about the acceptance of the prototype in the second evaluation session were descriptively analyzed using SPSS Statistics 25 (IBM Corp). 4.2.4 Ethical considerations Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Delft University of Technology (approval 1495). All participants were informed about the study and signed an informed consent form before participating. Participants were reimbursed for their participation with a €15 (US $15.88) donation to a low-SEP oriented charity. 4.3 Results 4.3.1 Phase 1: Content and information structure Based on the secondary analysis, an association scheme was created to present the content and information structure categorized under 5 different aspects of eHealth development (development, reach, adherence, evaluation, and implementation). Within each category (e.g., development), different themes could be found that relate to this category. Within each theme, associations could be found between barriers, facilitators, and attitude profiles. For instance, under the development aspect, themes such as “developing with the target group” can be identified (Figure 4.2). The overall information structure is visually presented in Figure 4.3. Figure 4.3 Overall information structure of the content of the guide resulting from the secondary analysis.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw