92 Chapter 6 REFERENCES 1. Kouwenberg CAE, van Hoogdalem LE, Mureau MAM, et al. Patients’ and surgeons’ experiences after failed breast reconstruction: A qualitative study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021; 74(7):1480-1485. 2. Darragh L, Robb A, Hardie CM, et al. Reducing implant loss rates in immediate breast reconstructions. Breast 2017; 31:208-213. 3. Fischer JP, Wes AM, Tuggle CT, 3rd, et al. Risk analysis of early implant loss after immediate breast reconstruction: a review of 14,585 patients. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 217(6):983-90. 4. Knight HJ, Musgrove JJ, Youssef MMG, et al. Significantly reducing implant loss rates in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction: A protocol and completed audit of quality assurance. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2020; 73(6):1043-1049. 5. Ozturk CN, Ozturk C, Soucise A, et al. Expander/Implant Removal After Breast Reconstruction: Analysis of Risk Factors and Timeline. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2018; 42(1):64-72. 6. Sue GR, Sun BJ, Lee GK. Complications After Two-Stage Expander Implant Breast Reconstruction Requiring Reoperation: A Critical Analysis of Outcomes. Ann Plast Surg 2018; 80(5S Suppl 5):S292-s294. 7. Hirsch EM, Seth AK, Kim JYS, et al. Analysis of risk factors for complications in expander/ implant breast reconstruction by stage of reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134(5):692e-699e. 8. Becherer BE HE, Young-Afat DA, Vrancken Peeters MTFD, Rakhorst HA, Mureau MAM. Revision Incidence after Immediate Direct-To-Implant Versus Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Results from a Nationwide Breast Implant Registry. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2022. 9. Blok YL, van Lierop E, Plat VD, et al. Implant Loss and Associated Risk Factors following Implant-based Breast Reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021; 9(7):e3708. 10. Rakhorst HA, Mureau MAM, Cooter RD, et al. The new opt-out Dutch National Breast Implant Registry - Lessons learnt from the road to implementation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2017; 70(10):1354-1360. 11. Spronk PER, Becherer BE, Hommes J, et al. How to improve patient safety and quality of care in breast implant surgery? First outcomes from the Dutch Breast Implant Registry (2015-2017). J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2019; 72(10):1607-1615. 12. Barati N, Vrolijk JJ, Becherer BE, et al. Using a Digital Implant Catalog Improves Data Quality and Reduces Administrative Burden in the Dutch Breast Implant Registry. Aesthet Surg J 2021. 13. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Bmj 2007; 335(7624):806-8. 14. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Jama 2013; 310(20):2191-4. 15. Moons KG, Kengne AP, Grobbee DE, et al. Risk prediction models: II. External validation, model updating, and impact assessment. Heart 2012; 98(9):691-8. 16. Azouz V, Lopez S, Wagner DS. Surgeon-Controlled Comparison of Direct-to-Implant and 2-Stage Tissue Expander-Implant Immediate Breast Reconstruction Outcomes. Ann Plast Surg 2018; 80(3):212-216. 17. Srinivasa DR, Garvey PB, Qi J, et al. Direct-to-Implant versus Two-Stage Tissue Expander/Implant Reconstruction: 2-Year Risks and Patient-Reported Outcomes from a Prospective, Multicenter Study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140(5):869-877.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw