118 Chapter 3 reviews but key items were rarely reported: a scoping review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;116:98-105. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.09.004. 35. Dixon C, Dixon PE, Sultan S, Mustafa R, Morgan RL, Murad MH, et al. Guideline Developers in the United States were Inconsistent in Applying Criteria for Appropriate GRADE Use. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.01.026. 36. Gopalakrishna G, Leeflang MM, Davenport C, Sanabria AJ, Alonso-Coello P, McCaffery K, et al. Barriers to making recommendations about medical tests: a qualitative study of European guideline developers. BMJ Open. 2016;6(9):e010549. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010549. 37. Norris SL, Meerpohl JJ, Akl EA, Schunemann HJ, Gartlehner G, Chen Y, et al. The skills and experience of GRADE methodologists can be assessed with a simple tool. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;79:150-8.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.07.001. 38. Sultan S, Morgan RL, Murad MH, Falck-Ytter Y, Dahm P, Schünemann HJ, et al. A Theoretical Framework and Competency-Based Approach to Training in Guideline Development. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(2):561-7. doi:10.1007/s11606-019-05502-9. 39. INGUIDE. International Guideline Training and Certification Program. Available from: www.inguide.org.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw