Required knowledge 153 4 References 1. Bossuyt PM, Deeks JJ, Leeflang MM, Takwoingi Y, Fleming E. Preface. 2023 In: Deeks JJ, Bossuyt PM, Leeflang MM, Takwoingi Y, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Version 20 (update July 2023). Cochrane. Available from: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook-diagnostic-test-accuracy/current. 2. Jaeschke R, Guyatt G, Sackett DL. Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Jama. 1994;271(5):389-91. doi:10.1001/jama.271.5.389. 3. Noguchi Y, Matsui K, Imura H, Kiyota M, Fukui T. Quantitative evaluation of the diagnostic thinking process in medical students. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(11):839-44. doi:10.1046/j.15251497.2002.20139.x. 4. Elstein AS. Thinking about diagnostic thinking: a 30-year perspective. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009;14 Suppl 1:7-18. doi:10.1007/s10459-009-9184-0. 5. Institute of Medicine Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. In: Graham R, Mancher M, Miller Wolman D, Greenfield S, Steinberg E, editors. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US). Copyright 2011 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.; 2011 isbn: doi:10.17226/13058. 6. Schunemann HJ, Lerda D, Dimitrova N, Alonso-Coello P, Grawingholt A, Quinn C, et al. Methods for Development of the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer Guidelines: Recommendations in the Era of Guideline Transparency. Annals of internal medicine. 2019;171(4):273-80. doi:10.7326/M18-3445. 7. Regional Office for Europe World Health Organisation. (eds.). Strengthening countries’ capacities to adopt and adapt evidence-based guidelines: a handbook for guideline contextualization. Copenhagen. World Health Organisation; 2023. Available from: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/372275/9789289060028eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. 8. Gopalakrishna G, Mustafa RA, Davenport C, Scholten RJ, Hyde C, Brozek J, et al. Applying Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) to diagnostic tests was challenging but doable. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(7):760-8. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.01.006. 9. Gopalakrishna G, Leeflang MM, Davenport C, Sanabria AJ, Alonso-Coello P, McCaffery K, et al. Barriers to making recommendations about medical tests: a qualitative study of European guideline developers. BMJ Open. 2016;6(9):e010549. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010549. 10. Tuut MK, de Beer JJA, Burgers JS, van de Griendt EJ, van der Weijden T, Langendam MW. Applying GRADE for diagnosis revealed methodological challenges: an illustrative example for guideline developers. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;131:123-32. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.11.021. 11. Tuut MK, Burgers JS, van der Weijden T, Langendam MW. Do clinical practice guidelines consider evidence about diagnostic test consequences on patient-relevant outcomes? A critical document analysis. Journal of evaluation in clinical practice. 2021 doi:10.1111/jep.13619. 12. Schunemann HJ, Mustafa R, Brozek J, Santesso N, Alonso-Coello P, Guyatt G, et al. GRADE Guidelines: 16. GRADE evidence to decision frameworks for tests in clinical practice and public health. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;76:89-98. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.032. 13. Sultan S, Morgan RL, Murad MH, Falck-Ytter Y, Dahm P, Schunemann HJ, et al. A Theoretical Framework and Competency-Based Approach to Training in Guideline Development. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(2):561-7. doi:10.1007/s11606-019-05502-9. 14. Norris SL, Meerpohl JJ, Akl EA, Schünemann HJ, Gartlehner G, Chen Y, et al. The skills and experience of GRADE methodologists can be assessed with a simple tool. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;79:150-8.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.07.001. 15. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic reviews. 2016;5(1):210. doi:10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4. 16. GRADE Working Group. GRADE Handbook. Handbook for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations using the GRADE approach. 2013. Available from: https://gdt.gradepro.org/app/handbook/handbook.html. 17. Deeks JJ, Bossuyt PM, Leeflang MM, Takwoingi Y (eds.). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy. Version 2.0 (update July 2023). Cochrane; 2023. Available from: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook-diagnostic-test-accuracy/current.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw