154 Chapter 4 18. Anderson LW, Krathwohl DR, Airasian PW, Cruikshank KA, Mayer RJ, Pintrich PR, et al. (eds.). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman; 2001. isbn:080131903X. 19. Albarqouni L, Hoffmann T, Straus S, Olsen NR, Young T, Ilic D, et al. Core Competencies in EvidenceBased Practice for Health Professionals: Consensus Statement Based on a Systematic Review and Delphi Survey. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1(2):e180281. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0281. 20. Hinneburg J, Hecht L, Berger-Höger B, Buhse S, Lühnen J, Steckelberg A. Development and piloting of a blended learning training programme for physicians and medical students to enhance their competences in evidence-based decision-making. Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen. 2020;150-152:104-11. doi:10.1016/j.zefq.2020.02.004. 21. Wieringa S, Dreesens D, Forland F, Hulshof C, Lukersmith S, Macbeth F, et al. Different knowledge, different styles of reasoning: a challenge for guideline development. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2018;23(3):87-91. doi:10.1136/bmjebm-2017-110844. 22. Berger B, Gerlach A, Groth S, Sladek U, Ebner K, Mühlhauser I, et al. Competence training in evidencebased medicine for patients, patient counsellors, consumer representatives and health care professionals in Austria: a feasibility study. Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen. 2013;107(1):44-52. doi:10.1016/j.zefq.2012.11.013. 23. Messerli FH, Hofstetter L, Agabiti-Rosei E, Burnier M, Elliott WJ, Franklin SS, et al. Expertise: no longer a sine qua non for guideline authors? J Hypertens. 2017;35(8):1564-6. doi:10.1097/hjh.0000000000001435. 24. Zuiderent-Jerak T, Forland F, Macbeth F. Guidelines should reflect all knowledge, not just clinical trials. Bmj. 2012;345:e6702. doi:10.1136/bmj.e6702. 25. Bossuyt PM, Irwig L, Craig J, Glasziou P. Comparative accuracy: assessing new tests against existing diagnostic pathways. BMJ. 2006;332(7549):1089-92. doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7549.1089. 26. Dickersin K. The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. Jama. 1990;263(10):1385-9. 27. Ioannidis JP. Effect of the statistical significance of results on the time to completion and publication of randomized efficacy trials. Jama. 1998;279(4):281-6. doi:10.1001/jama.279.4.281. 28. McInnes MDF, Moher D, Thombs BD, McGrath TA, Bossuyt PM, and the P-DTAG, et al. Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies: The PRISMA-DTA Statement. Jama. 2018;319(4):388-96. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.19163. 29. Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3:25. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-3-25. 30. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Annals of internal medicine. 2011;155(8):529-36. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009. 31. Brozek JL, Akl EA, Jaeschke R, Lang DM, Bossuyt P, Glasziou P, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: Part 2 of 3. The GRADE approach to grading quality of evidence about diagnostic tests and strategies. Allergy. 2009;64(8):1109-16. doi:10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02083.x. 32. Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD, Brozek J, Glasziou P, Jaeschke R, Vist GE, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ. 2008;336(7653):1106-10. doi:10.1136/bmj.39500.677199.AE. 33. Schunemann HJ, Wiercioch W, Etxeandia I, Falavigna M, Santesso N, Mustafa R, et al. Guidelines 2.0: systematic development of a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne. 2014;186(3):E123-42. doi:10.1503/cmaj.131237. 34. Mustafa RA, Wiercioch W, Santesso N, Cheung A, Prediger B, Baldeh T, et al. Decision-Making about Healthcare Related Tests and Diagnostic Strategies: User Testing of GRADE Evidence Tables. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0134553. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0134553. 35. Medical test. Wikipedia. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_test. 36. Gopalakrishna G, Langendam MW, Scholten RJ, Bossuyt PM, Leeflang MM. Guidelines for guideline developers: a systematic review of grading systems for medical tests. Implement Sci. 2013;8:78. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-78.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw