General introduction 23 1 References 1. Institute of Medicine Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. In: Graham R, Mancher M, Miller Wolman D, Greenfield S, Steinberg E, editors. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US). Copyright 2011 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.; 2011 isbn: doi:10.17226/13058. 2. Burgers JS, Van der Weijden T, Grol R. Richtlijnen als hulpmiddel bij de verbetering van de zorg. In: Wensing M, Grol R, editors. Implementatie. 7 ed. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum; 2017. p. 99-124. isbn: 978-90-368-1731-8. doi:10.1007/978-90-368-1732-5. 3. Adviesgroep Kwaliteitsstandaarden Zorginstituut Nederland. AQUA-Leidraad. Zorginstituut Nederland; 2021. Available from: https://www.zorginzicht.nl/binaries/content/assets/zorginzicht/ontwikkeltoolsontwikkelen/aqua-leidraad.pdf. 4. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. How we develop NICE guidelines. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2021. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/about/what-we-do/ourprogrammes/nice-guidance/nice-guidelines/how-we-develop-nice-guidelines. 5. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. SIGN 50. A guideline developer's handbook. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network; 2019. Available from: https://www.sign.ac.uk/media/2038/sign50_2019.pdf. 6. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7650):9246. doi:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD. 7. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Atkins D, Brozek J, Vist G, et al. GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):395-400. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.012. 8. Alonso-Coello P, Oxman AD, Moberg J, Brignardello-Petersen R, Akl EA, Davoli M, et al. GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical practice guidelines. BMJ. 2016;353:i2089. doi:10.1136/bmj.i2089. 9. Alonso-Coello P, Schunemann HJ, Moberg J, Brignardello-Petersen R, Akl EA, Davoli M, et al. GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction. BMJ. 2016;353:i2016. doi:10.1136/bmj.i2016. 10. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso-Coello P, Rind D, et al. GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence--imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1283-93. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.012. 11. Guyatt GH, Ebrahim S, Alonso-Coello P, Johnston BC, Mathioudakis AG, Briel M, et al. GRADE guidelines 17: assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant outcome data in a body of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;87:14-22. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.05.005. 12. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, Kunz R, Vist G, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):383-94. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026. 13. Balshem H, Helfand M, Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):401-6. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015. 14. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence--study limitations (risk of bias). J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):407-15. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.017. 15. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Montori V, Vist G, Kunz R, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1277-82. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.011. 16. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Woodcock J, Brozek J, Helfand M, et al. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1294-302. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.03.017. 17. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Woodcock J, Brozek J, Helfand M, et al. GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence--indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1303-10. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.04.014. 18. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Sultan S, Glasziou P, Akl EA, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1311-6. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.06.004.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw