Mariska Tuut

234 Chapter 7 References 1. DECIDE Collaboration. Developing and Evaluating Communication Strategies to Support Informed Decisions and Practice Based Evidence (DECIDE). Available from: http://www.decide-collaboration.eu. 2. GIN-McMaster. GIN-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist (GDC). 2014. Available from: https://cebgrade.mcmaster.ca/guidelinechecklistprintable.pdf. 3. Piggott T, Baldeh T, Akl EA, Junek M, Wiercioch W, Schneider R, et al. Supporting effective participation in health guideline development groups: The Guideline Participant Tool. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;130:428. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.07.022. 4. Schunemann H, Akl E. Checklist for Guideline Panel Chairs, v 3.1. 2017. Available from: https://macgrade.mcmaster.ca/resources/checklist-for-guideline-panel-chairs/. 5. Schunemann HJ, Wiercioch W, Etxeandia I, Falavigna M, Santesso N, Mustafa R, et al. Guidelines 2.0: systematic development of a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne. 2014;186(3):E123-42. doi:10.1503/cmaj.131237. 6. Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, Craig P, Baird J, Blazeby JM, et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2021;374:n2061. doi:10.1136/bmj.n2061. 7. O'Cathain A, Croot L, Duncan E, Rousseau N, Sworn K, Turner KM, et al. Guidance on how to develop complex interventions to improve health and healthcare. BMJ Open. 2019;9(8):e029954. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029954. 8. McKenney S, Reeves TC. Educational design research: Portraying, conducting, and enhancing productive scholarship. Med Educ. 2021;55(1):82-92. doi:10.1111/medu.14280. 9. Sultan S, Morgan RL, Murad MH, Falck-Ytter Y, Dahm P, Schünemann HJ, et al. A Theoretical Framework and Competency-Based Approach to Training in Guideline Development. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(2):561-7. doi:10.1007/s11606-019-05502-9. 10. INGUIDE. International Guideline Training and Certification Program. Available from: www.inguide.org. 11. Guidelines International Network. GIN Public Toolkit: patient and public involvement in guidelines. 2024. Available from: https://g-i-n.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Toolkit-combined_revJAN24.pdf. 12. Schünemann HJ, Mustafa R, Brozek J, Santesso N, Alonso-Coello P, Guyatt G, et al. GRADE Guidelines: 16. GRADE evidence to decision frameworks for tests in clinical practice and public health. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;76:89-98. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.032. 13. Zhang Y, Alonso-Coello P, Guyatt GH, Yepes-Nunez JJ, Akl EA, Hazlewood G, et al. GRADE Guidelines: 19. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences-Risk of bias and indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;111:94-104. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.01.013. 14. Andrews JC, Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD, Pottie K, Meerpohl JJ, Coello PA, et al. GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(7):726-35. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.003. 15. Zhang Y, Coello PA, Guyatt GH, Yepes-Nunez JJ, Akl EA, Hazlewood G, et al. GRADE guidelines: 20. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferencesinconsistency, imprecision, and other domains. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;111:83-93. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.05.011. 16. Pottie K, Welch V, Morton R, Akl EA, Eslava-Schmalbach JH, Katikireddi V, et al. GRADE equity guidelines 4: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: evidence to decision process. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;90:84-91. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.08.001. 17. GRADE Working Group. GRADE Handbook. Handbook for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations using the GRADE approach. 2013. Available from: https://gdt.gradepro.org/app/handbook/handbook.html. 18. Alonso-Coello P, Oxman AD, Moberg J, Brignardello-Petersen R, Akl EA, Davoli M, et al. GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical practice guidelines. BMJ. 2016;353:i2089. doi:10.1136/bmj.i2089. 19. Schunemann HJ, Mustafa RA, Brozek J, Santesso N, Bossuyt PM, Steingart KR, et al. GRADE guidelines: 22. The GRADE approach for tests and strategies-from test accuracy to patient-important outcomes and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;111:69-82. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.003.

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw