General introduction 25 1 38. Wulff HR. (eds.). Principes van klinisch denken en handelen; Nederlandse bewerking. Utrecht: Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema; 1980. isbn:90 313 0399 2. 39. Elstein AS, Schwartz A. Clinical problem solving and diagnostic decision making: selective review of the cognitive literature. BMJ. 2002;324(7339):729-32. doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7339.729. 40. Hopayian K. Why medicine still needs a scientific foundation: restating the hypotheticodeductive model - part two. The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners. 2004;54(502):402-3; discussion 4-5. 41. Hopayian K. Why medicine still needs a scientific foundation: restating the hypotheticodeductive model - part one. The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners. 2004;54(502):400-1; discussion 4-5. 42. Van Leeuwen YD, Baggen JL. De medische beslissing: juist én zinnig? Huisarts en Wetenschap. 2002;45(2):66-9. 43. Stolper E. Gut feelings in general practice. Maastricht: Maastricht University; 2010. 44. Mustafa RA, Wiercioch W, Santesso N, Cheung A, Prediger B, Baldeh T, et al. Decision-Making about Healthcare Related Tests and Diagnostic Strategies: User Testing of GRADE Evidence Tables. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0134553. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0134553. 45. Deeks JJ. Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. BMJ. 2001;323(7305):157-62. doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7305.157. 46. Horvath AR, Lord SJ, StJohn A, Sandberg S, Cobbaert CM, Lorenz S, et al. From biomarkers to medical tests: the changing landscape of test evaluation. Clin Chim Acta. 2014;427:49-57. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2013.09.018. 47. Bossuyt PM, Irwig L, Craig J, Glasziou P. Comparative accuracy: assessing new tests against existing diagnostic pathways. BMJ. 2006;332(7549):1089-92. doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7549.1089. 48. Mustafa RA, Wiercioch W, Cheung A, Prediger B, Brozek J, Bossuyt P, et al. Decision making about healthcare-related tests and diagnostic test strategies. Paper 2: a review of methodological and practical challenges. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;92:18-28. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.09.003. 49. Welch HG, Black WC. Overdiagnosis in cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102(9):605-13. doi:10.1093/jnci/djq099. 50. Jacobs TS, Forno E, Brehm JM, Acosta-Perez E, Han YY, Blatter J, et al. Underdiagnosis of allergic rhinitis in underserved children. Journal of Allergy & Clinical Immunology. 2014;134(3):737-9.e6. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2014.03.028. 51. O'Sullivan JW, Albasri A, Nicholson BD, Perera R, Aronson JK, Roberts N, et al. Overtesting and undertesting in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2018;8(2):e018557. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018557. 52. Rohr UP, Binder C, Dieterle T, Giusti F, Messina CG, Toerien E, et al. The Value of In Vitro Diagnostic Testing in Medical Practice: A Status Report. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0149856. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0149856. 53. Choosing wisely. Do you really need that medical test or treatment? The answer may be no. Choosing wisely; 2017. Available from: https://www.choosingwisely.org/files/Do-You-Need-That-Test_4x9Eng.pdf. 54. PerryUndem Research/Communication. Unnecessary Tests and Procedures in the Health Care System. 2014. Available from: https://www.choosingwisely.org/files/Final-Choosing-Wisely-SurveyReport.pdf. 55. Hsu J, Brozek JL, Terracciano L, Kreis J, Compalati E, Stein AT, et al. Application of GRADE: making evidence-based recommendations about diagnostic tests in clinical practice guidelines. Implement Sci. 2011;6:62. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-62. 56. Gopalakrishna G, Mustafa RA, Davenport C, Scholten RJ, Hyde C, Brozek J, et al. Applying Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) to diagnostic tests was challenging but doable. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(7):760-8. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.01.006. 57. Gopalakrishna G, Leeflang MM, Davenport C, Sanabria AJ, Alonso-Coello P, McCaffery K, et al. Barriers to making recommendations about medical tests: a qualitative study of European guideline developers. BMJ Open. 2016;6(9):e010549. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010549.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw