155 Exploring the association between exercise adherence and recovery of low back pain Table 1 Continued. Variable Overall (n=173) “Declining adherence” class (n=21) “Stable adherence” class (n=78) “Increasing adherence” class (n=74) CSI, median [IQR] 27.0 [20.0, 38.0] 31.0 [20.0, 45.0] 26.0 [20.0, 36.0] 28.5 [20.0, 38.2] GSE Scale, median [IQR] 33.0 [30.0, 35.8] 32.0 [30.0, 35.0] 34.0 [30.0, 36.0] 32.0 [30.0, 36.0] PAM-13 Dutch, median [IQR] 63.1 [53.2, 72.5] 61.9 [52.7, 69.0] 63.1 [55.6, 72.5] 63.1 [53.2, 72.5] EuroQol-5D-5L, median [IQR] 0.9 [0.8, 1.0] 0.9 [0.8, 1.0] 0.9 [0.8, 1.0] 0.9 [0.8, 1.0] Number of treatment sessions, median [IQR] 4.0 [3.0, 6.0] 6.0 [4.0, 7.0] 4.5 [3.0, 6.0] 4.0 [3.0, 7.0] EXAS, mean (SD) 59.2 (25.3) 46.0 (19.4) 81.0 (12.4) 39.9 (25.3) Recovered from LBP, n (%) 45 (28.5) 4 (21.1) 18 (25.4) 23 (33.8) Treatment (intervention), n (%) 87 (50.3) 12 (57.1) 41 (52.6) 34 (45.9) IQR Interquartile range, SD standard deviation, BMI Body Mass Index, LBP Low back pain, ODI Oswestry Disability Index, NPRS Numeric Pain Rating Scale, FABQ Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, PCS Pain Catastrophizing Scale, CSI Central Sensitization Inventory, GSE General Self-Efficacy, PAM-13 Dutch Patient Activation Measure, EXAS Exercise Adherence Rating Scale 7
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw