86 Chapter 4 Figure 3 Distribution of compliance rates between participants Associations between the compliance rate and eight demographic and contextual variables were evaluated. There was no difference in the percentage of completed diaries, t(43) = 1.03, p = 0.311 between participants diagnosed with a mild intellectual disability (M = 65.3, SD = 33.4) and those with borderline intellectual functioning diagnosis (M = 74.6, SD = 30.8). Fisher's exact test further showed that this diagnosis was not associated with drop-out (p =0.197). A Kruskal–Wallis test revealed that there was a significant difference in compliance rates between the three care types (χ2 (2) = 12.80, p =0.010), with those in the juvenile detention system (M =19.4) having lower compliance rates than participants receiving ambulatory (M = 88.9) or residential care (M = 75.6). Participants who could enter diaries on their own phone—rather than on a group-owned device—had a higher compliance rate (rpb = 0.58, p < .001). Furthermore, participants who were reminded more frequently by staff to complete diaries had a lower compliance rate (r =−0.57, p <.001). The compliance rates did not show significant associations with gender (rpb = −0.33, p =0.09), age (r = 0.25, p = 0.33), total IQ (r = 0.04, p = 0.80), the number of items included in daily diaries (r = −0.04, p = 0.80), or the frequency of diary answer integration in treatment (r = 0.08, p = 0.80). 3.3 Acceptability Most participants experienced their participation in the daily diary study as ‘pleasant’ (n = 19, 39%) or ‘very pleasant’ (n = 11, 22%). Only one participant (2%) found the experience ‘unpleasant’, nobody rated it as ‘very unpleasant’, and 18
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw