150 Chapter 6 16. McInnes RJ, Aitken-Arbuckle A, Lake S, et al. Implementing continuity of midwife carer - just a friendly face? A realist evaluation. BMC Health Serv Res 2020;20(1):304. doi: 10.1186/ s12913-020-05159-9 [published Online First: 20200415] 17. McInnes RJ, Martin CJH, MacArthur J. Midwifery continuity of carer: Developing a realist evaluation framework to evaluate the implementation of strategic change in Scotland. Midwifery 2018;66:103-10. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.07.007 [published Online First: 20180809] 18. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008;337:a1655. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1655 [published Online First: 20080929] 19. Greenhalgh T PR, Wong G, Westhorp G, Greenhalgh J, Manzano A, Jagosh J. What is a mechanism? What is a mechanism? : The RAMESES II project; 2017 [Available from: http:// www.ramesesproject.org/media/RAMESES_II_What_is_a_mechanism.pdf accessed 29-12024. 20. Dalkin SM, Greenhalgh J, Jones D, et al. What’s in a mechanism? Development of a key concept in realist evaluation. Implement Sci 2015;10:49. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0237-x [published Online First: 20150416] 21. Greenhalgh T PR, Wong G. Realist evaluation, realist synthesis, realist research – what’s in a name? 2017 [Available from: https://www.ramesesproject.org/media/RAMESES_II_RE_RS_ RR_whats_in_a_name.pdf accessed 27 sept 2023. 22. Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K. Realist review--a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J Health Serv Res Policy 2005;10 Suppl 1:2134. doi: 10.1258/1355819054308530 23. Wong G WG, Pawson R, Greenhalgh T. Realist synthesis - RAMESES training materials 2013 [Available from: http://www.ramesesproject.org/media/Realist_reviews_training_materials. pdf accessed 2-1 2024. 24. Jagosh J. Realist Synthesis for Public Health: Building an Ontologically Deep Understanding of How Programs Work, For Whom, and In Which Contexts. Annu Rev Public Health 2019;40:36172. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044451 [published Online First: 20190111] 25. Greenhalgh T PR, Wong G, Westhorp G, Greenhalgh J, Manzano A, Jagosh J. “Theory” in realist evaluation: The RAMESES II project; 2017 [Available from: https://www.ramesesproject.org/ media/RAMESES_II_Theory_in_realist_evaluation.pdf accessed 9-4-2024. 26. Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, et al. RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses. BMC Med 2013;11:21. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-21 [published Online First: 20130129] 27. Dada S, Dalkin S, Gilmore B, et al. Applying and reporting relevance, richness and rigour in realist evidence appraisals: Advancing key concepts in realist reviews. Res Synth Methods 2023;14(3):504-14. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1630 [published Online First: 20230314] 28. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev 2016;5(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4 [published Online First: 20161205] 29. Greenhalgh T PR, Wong G, Westhorp G, Greenhalgh J, Manzano A, Jagosh J. Retroduction in realist evaluation: The RAMESES II project; 2017 [Available from: https://www.ramesesproject. org/media/RAMESES_II_Retroduction.pdf accessed 9-4-2024. 30. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. 2 ed: Elsevier 2015. 31. Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology: University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA 2004. 32. Bayes S, Juggins E, Whitehead L, De Leo A. Australian midwives’ experiences of implementing practice change. Midwifery 2019;70:38-45. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.12.012 [published Online First: 20181215] 33. Hajjaj JP. Continuity and consultation. British Journal of Midwifery 2020;28(9):674-76. 34. Continuity of carer. Midwives 2019:34-38.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw