151 Realist review of Midwife-Led Continuity of Care implementation 35. Jervis B. Continuity within the NHS: it can and does happen, but why not for everyone? Part one -- a macro level analysis. MIDIRS Midwifery Digest 2016;26(3):297-303. 36. Perdok H, Mokkink L, van Dillen J, et al. Opinions of Maternity Care Professionals About Integration of Care During Labor for “Moderate Risk” Indications: A Delphi Study in The Netherlands. Birth-Iss Perinat C 2014;41(2):195-205. doi: 10.1111/birt.12102 37. Munro S, Kornelsen J, Grzybowski S. Models of maternity care in rural environments: Barriers and attributes of interprofessional collaboration with midwives. Midwifery 2013;29(6):64652. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.06.004 38. Burau V, Overgaard C. Caseload midwifery as organisational change: The interplay between professional and organisational projects in Denmark. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2015;15(1) doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0546-8 39. McKellar L, Newnham E, Fleet JA, Adelson P. Midwifery-led care in South Australia: Looking back to move forward. Women and Birth 2021;34(5):e537-e45. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.10.011 40. Perdok H, Jans S, Verhoeven C, et al. Opinions of maternity care professionals and other stakeholders about integration of maternity care: A qualitative study in the Netherlands. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2016;16(1) doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0975-z 41. Harris JM, Watts K, Page L, Sandall J. Reflections on an educational intervention to encourage midwives to work in a continuity of care model – exploration and potential solutions. Midwifery 2020;88:102733. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102733 42. Hollins Martin CJ, MacArthur J, Martin CR, McInnes RJ. Midwives’ views of changing to a Continuity of Midwifery Care (CMC) model in Scotland: A baseline survey. Women and Birth 2020;33(5):e409-e19. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.08.005 43. Wiseman O, Emmett L, Hickford G, et al. The challenges and opportunities for implementing group antenatal care (‘Pregnancy Circles’) as part of standard NHS maternity care: A co designed qualitative study. Midwifery 2022;109:103333. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2022.103333 44. Prussing E, Browne G, Dowse E, et al. Implementing midwifery continuity of care models in regional Australia: A constructivist grounded theory study. Women and Birth 2023;36(1):99 107. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2022.03.006 45. Amsterdam UMC MS. Unpublished dataset of interviews with various maternity care stakeholders on the implementation of antenatal cardiotocography in primary care, 2021. 46. Adcock JE, Sidebotham M, Gamble J. What do midwifery leaders need in order to be effective in contributing to the reform of maternity services? Women and Birth 2022;35(2):e142-e52. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2021.04.008 47. Craig G. Continuity of carer. AIMS Journal 2016;28(4) 48. University EN. The All-You-Need-To-Know-About-Continuity-Of-Carer Newsletter 2024 [March 2024:[Available from: https://sway.cloud.microsoft/Aye20HfQNBimcbLS?ref=email. 49. Brown M, Dietsch E. The feasibility of caseload midwifery in rural Australia: A literature review. Women and Birth 2013;26(1):e1-e4. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2012.08.003 50. Homer CS. Models of maternity care: Evidence for midwifery continuity of care. Medical Journal of Australia 2016;205(8):370-74. doi: 10.5694/mja16.00844 51. Styles C, Kearney L, George K. Implementation and upscaling of midwifery continuity of care: The experience of midwives and obstetricians. Women and Birth 2020;33(4):343-51. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.08.008 52. Corrigan AE, Lake S, McInnes RJ. Normalisation process theory as a conceptual framework for continuity of carer implementation. Women and Birth 2021;34(2):E204-E09. doi: 10.1016/j. wombi.2020.02.017 53. Turner S, Crowther S, Lau A. A grounded theory study on midwifery managers’ views and experiences of implementing and sustaining continuity of carer models within the UK maternity system. Women and Birth 2022;35(5):E421-E31. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2021.10.010 6
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw