17 Introduction 19. Rayment-Jones H, Dalrymple K, Harris J, et al. Project20: Does continuity of care and communitybased antenatal care improve maternal and neonatal birth outcomes for women with social risk factors? A prospective, observational study. PloS one 2021;16(5):e0250947. 20. Homer CS, Leap N, Edwards N, Sandall J. Midwifery continuity of carer in an area of high socioeconomic disadvantage in London: a retrospective analysis of Albany Midwifery Practice outcomes using routine data (1997–2009). Midwifery 2017;48:1-10. 21. Sandall J, Turienzo CF, Devane D, et al. Midwife continuity of care models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2024(4). 22. Perdok H, Jans S, Verhoeven C, et al. Opinions of maternity care professionals and other stakeholders about integration of maternity care: a qualitative study in the Netherlands. BMC pregnancy and childbirth 2016;16:1-12. 23. Greenhalgh T PR WG, Westhorp G, Greenhalgh J, Manzano A, Jagosh J. What is a mechanism? What is a programme mechanism?: The RAMESES II project [online]. 2017. http://www. ramesesproject.org/media/RAMESES_II_What_is_a_mechanism.pdf (accessed 29 January, 2024). 24. Wong G WG PR, Greenhalgh T. Realist synthesis - RAMESES training materials [online]. 2013. http://www.ramesesproject.org/media/Realist_reviews_training_materials. pdf (accessed 29 January, 2024). 25. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 2008;337. 26. Koninklijke Nederlandse Organisatie van Verloskunde (KNOV). Capaciteitsproblematiek in de verloskunde [online]. 2022. https://www.knov.nl/kennis-en-scholing/vakkennisenwetenschap/vakkennis/capaciteitsproblematiek-in-de-verloskunde (accessed 22 November, 2023). 27. Offerhaus PM, Hukkelhoven CW, de Jonge A, et al. Persisting rise in referrals during labor in primary midwife-led care in the Netherlands. Birth (Berkeley, Calif) 2013;40(3):192-201. 28. Colvin CJ, de Heer J, Winterton L, et al. A systematic review of qualitative evidence on barriers and facilitators to the implementation of task-shifting in midwifery services. Midwifery 2013;29(10):1211-21. 29. Rijksoverheid. De juiste zorg op de juiste plek [online]. 2018. https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/ documenten/rapporten/2018/04/06/rapport-de-juiste-zorg-op-de-juiste-plek (accessed 27 November, 2024). 30. van Hoof SJ, Quanjel TC, Kroese ME, et al. Substitution of outpatient hospital care with specialist care in the primary care setting: A systematic review on quality of care, health and costs. PloS one 2019;14(8):e0219957. 31. Grivell RM, Alfirevic Z, Gyte GM, Devane D. Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015(9):CD007863. 32. Excellence NIfC. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. The use of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring. Evidence Based Clinical Guidline N. 8: London: RCOG Press, 2001. 33. Preboth M. ACOG guidelines on antepartum fetal surveillance. American family physician 2000;62(5):1184-88. 34. Spiby H. The NICE guidelines on electronic fetal monitoring. British Journal of Midwifery 2001;9(8):489-89. 35. FIGO Subcommittee on Standards on Perinatal Medicine. Guidelines for the use of fetal monitoring. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1987;25:159-67. 36. Nijhuis JG, Essed G, van Geijn HP, Visser GHA. Foetale bewaking: Reed Business 1998. 37. Banta HD, Thacker SB. Historical controversy in health technology assessment:: The case of electronic fetal monitoring. Obstetrical & gynecological survey 2001;56(11):707-19. 38. Bernardes J, Costa-Pereira A, Ayres-de-Campos D, et al. Evaluation of interobserver agreement of cardiotocograms. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 1997;57(1):33-37. 39. Figueras F, Albela S, Bonino S, et al. Visual analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracings: inter-and intra-observer agreement and impact of knowledge of neonatal outcome. 2005 1
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw