33 Observer agreement of aCTG assessments REFERENCES 1. de Jonge A, Downe S, Page L, et al. Value based maternal and new-born care requires alignment of adequate resources with high value activities. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):1-6. 2. Porter ME, Teisberg EO. Redefining Health Care: Creating Value-Based Competition on Results. Harvard Business Press; 2006. 3. Grivell RM, Alfirevic Z, Gyte GM, Devane D. Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.2015;9:CD007863. 4. Neppelenbroek E, Verhoeven C. Handboek implementatie antenataal CTG in verloskundigenpraktijken. Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Midwifery Science; 2022:1-102. 5. Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4:CD004667. 6. Martínez-González NA, Djalali S, Tandjung R, et al. Substitution of physicians by nurses in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):1-17. 7. Colvin CJ, de Heer J, Winterton L, et al. A systematic review of qualitative evidence on barriers and facilitators to the implementation of task- shifting in midwifery services. Midwifery.2013;29(10):1211-1221. 8. van den Berg LM, Gordon BBM, Kleefstra SM, et al. Centralization of acute obstetric care in the Netherlands: a qualitative study to explore the experiences of stakeholders with adaptations in organization of care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):1-9. 9. Bernardes J, Costa-Pereira A, Ayres-de-Campos D, van Geijn H, Pereira-Leite L. Evaluation of interobserver agreement of cardiotocograms. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1997;57(1):33-37. 10. Donker DK, van Geijn HP, Hasman A. Interobserver variation in the assessment of fetal heart rate recordings. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1993;52(1):21-28. 11. Figueras F, Albela S, Bonino S, et al. Visual analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracings: inter-and intra-observer agreement and impact of knowledge of neonatal outcome. 2005. 12. Ayres-de-Campos D, Bernardes J, Costa-Pereira A, Pereira-Leite L. Inconsistencies in classification by experts of cardiotocograms and subsequent clinical decision. Br J Obstet Gynaecol.1999;106(12):1307-1310. 13. Lotgering FK, Wallenburg HC, Schouten HJ. Interobserver and intraobserver variation in the assessment of antepartum cardiotocograms. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;144(6):701-705. 14. Di Lieto A, Giani U, Campanile M, de Falco M, Scaramellino M, Papa R. Conventional and computerized antepartum telecardiotocography. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 2003;55(1):37-40. 15. Obstetric Vademecum. Eindrapport van de Commissie Verloskunde van het College voor zorgverzekeringen [Final Report of the Advisory board on Obstetrics of the Health Care Insurance Board]. College voorZorgverzekeringen; 2003. 16. Ayres-de-Campos D, Spong CY, Chandraharan E, Panel FIFMEC.FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2015;131(1):13-24. 17. Sense4Baby. Accessed September 17, 2022. https:// www.ict- healthcare. eu/nl/oplossingen/ ctg- thuismonitoring/ sense4baby 18. Kolkman D, Offerhaus P, Middelsdorp JM, Erwich JJHM. NVOGKNOV Guideline. Verminderde kindsbewegingen tijdens de zwangerschap; 2013. 19. Kottner J, Audigé L, Brorson S, et al. Guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS) were proposed. Int J NursStud. 2011;48(6):661-671. 20. Mokkink LB, de Vet H, Diemeer S, Eekhout I. Sample size recommendations for studies on reliability and measurement error: an on-line application based on simulation studies. Health Serv Outcome Res Methodol. 2023;23(3):241-265. 2
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw