34 Chapter 2 21. Nezlek JB. A practical guide to understanding reliability in studies of within-person variability. J Res Pers. 2017;69:149-155. 22. Altaye M, Dormer A, Klar N. Inference procedures for assessing interobserver agreement among multiple raters. Biometrics.2001;57(2):584-588. 23. Cicchetti D, Bronen R, Spencer S, et al. Rating scales, scales of measurement, issues of reliability: resolving some critical issues for clinicians and researchers. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2006;194(8):557-564. 24. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-174. 25. Rei M, Tavares S, Pinto P, et al. Interobserver agreement in CTG interpretation using the 2015 FIGO guidelines for intrapartum fetal monitoring. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;205:27-31. 26. Rhöse S, Heinis AM, Vandenbussche F, van Drongelen J, van Dillen J. Inter-and intra- observer agreement of non- reassuring cardiotocography analysis and subsequent clinical management. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014;93(6):596-602. 27. Neppelenbroek EM, Ammerlaan AJ, van der Heijden OW, et al. Antenatal cardiotocography in primary midwife-led care: Women’s satisfaction. Birth (Berkeley, Calif). 2023;50:798-807. 28. Neppelenbroek EM, Verhoeven CJ, van der Heijden OW, et al. Antenatal cardiotocography in Dutch primary midwife-led care: maternal and perinatal outcomes and serious adverse events. A prospective observational cohort study. Women Birth. 2024;37(1):177-187. 29. Baker H, Pilarski N, Hodgetts- Morton V, Morris R. Comparison of visual and computerized antenatal cardiotocography in the prevention of perinatal morbidity and mortality. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;263:33-43.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw