94 Chapter 4 Table 3: Association between variables and high general satisfaction (≥9) for the Amsterdam and Zwolle regions (n= 427) (continued) General satisfaction ≥ 9 n= 482 (77.4%) General satisfaction < 9 n= 141 (22.6%) OR [95% CI] AOR [95% CI]* Shorter than hospital (n=371) 288 (77.6) 83 (22.4) ref ref Longer than hospital (n= 44) 33 (75.0) 11 (25.0) 0.87 (0.42-1.79) 0.68 (0.23-2.01) Waiting time (minutes) for appointment None (n= 499) 396 (79.4) 103 (20.6) ref ref < 15 (n= 67) 50 (74.6) 17 (25.4) 0.77 (0.42-1.38) 0.68 (0.29-1.60) ≥15 (n=48) 31 (64.6) 17 (35.4) 0.47 (0.25-0.89) 0.82 (0.30-2.21) Comfort during aCTG Yes, completely (n= 380) 325 (85.5) 55 (14.5) ref ref Mostly (n= 174) 119 (68.4) 55 (31.6) 0.37 (0.24-0.56) 0.24 (0.13-0.44) Somewhat (n= 59) 30 (50.8) 29 (49.2) 0.18 (0.10-0.31) 0.19 (0.08-0.45) Time between first contact and when the aCTG was done (hours) < 1 (n= 214) 170 (79.4) 44 (20.6) ref ref 1 – 2 (n= 156) 119 (76.3) 37 (23.7) 0.83 (0.51-1.37) 0.77 (0.42-1.43) >2 (n=59) 41 (69.5) 18 (30.5) 0.59 (0.31-1.13) 0.58 (0.25-1.34) aCTG= antenatal cardiotocography. ref = reference category. NA = not applicable. AOR= Adjusted odds ratio Statistically significant differences have been reported in bold *Adjusted odds ratios corrected for maternal age, gestational age, SES, own care provider involved, additional examination by ultrasound, travel distance, waiting time, time between first contact and the CTG † Group too small for analysis DISCUSSION Main Findings The aim of this study was to examine the satisfaction of pregnant women who received an aCTG in primary midwife-led care and the factors that were related to satisfaction.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw