312 Dec;8(6):549–56. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28980163 34. Bazot M, Daraï E. Role of transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis. Fertility and Sterility. 2018. 35. Dueholm M. Transvaginal ultrasound for diagnosis of adenomyosis: a review. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol [Internet]. 2006 Aug;20(4):569–82. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16545618 36. Dueholm M, Lundorf E, Hansen ES, Sorensen JS, Ledertoug S, Olesen F. Magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. 2001;76(3):588-594. Available from: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/central/doi/10.1002/central/CN00424865/full 37. Champaneria R, Abedin P, Daniels J, Balogun M, Khan KS. Ultrasound scan and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: Systematic review comparing test accuracy. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2010. 38. Mark AS, Hricak H, Heinrichs LW, Hendrickson MR, Winkler ML, Bachica JA, et al. Adenomyosis and leiomyoma: Differential diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology. 1987; 39. Vitiello D, McCarthy S. Diagnostic imaging of myomas. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America. 2006. 40. Exacoustos C, Manganaro L, Zupi E. Imaging for the evaluation of endometriosis and adenomyosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014; 41. Örs F, Lev-Toaff AS, Bergin D. Cystic adenomyoma: Transvaginal ultrasound and MRI findings. Anatol J Clin Investig. 2009; 42. Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K. Adenomyosis: Usual and unusual imaging manifestations, pitfalls, and problem-solving MR imaging techniques. Radiographics. 2011; 43. Gordts S, Brosens JJ, Fusi L, Benagiano G, Brosens I. Uterine adenomyosis: A need for uniform terminology and consensus classification. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008; 44. Reinhold C, Tafazoli F, Wang L. Imaging features of adenomyosis. Hum Reprod Update [Internet]. 1998 Jul;4(4):337–49. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9825849 45. Tellum T, Matic G V, Dormagen JB, Nygaard S, Viktil E, Qvigstad E, et al. Diagnosing adenomyosis with MRI: a prospective study revisiting the junctional zone thickness cutoff of 12 mm as a diagnostic marker. Eur Radiol [Internet]. 2019 Dec;29(12):6971–81. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31264010
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw