lvi Phillips et al. 1996 Prospective See inclusion criteria Yes Yes Yes Low Somewhat, only included adenomyoma patients instead of adenomyosis generally Reinhold et al. 1996 Prospective see inclusion criteria Yes Yes Yes Low Yes Stamatopoulos et al. 2012 Prospective see inclusion criteria Yes Yes Yes Low Yes Tellum et al. 2019 Prospective see inclusion criteria Yes Yes Yes Low Yes Tian et al. 2016 Prospective see inclusion criteria Yes Yes Yes Low Yes NR: not reported Table 2.S8 Index Test: Risk of Bias and Applicability Author, Year MRI method MRI interpretation Evaluat ion by experie nced radiolo gist? MRI (re) evaluat ed in realtime during study proced ures? Blinded to result of histopat hology? Prespecif ied defini tion for aden omyo sis on MRI? Men strua l cycl e acco unte d for? Potential for bias in MRI interpret ation? Does the applicati on of the MRI match the research question? Ascher et al. 1994 System: 1.0T or 1.5T Slice Thickness: 5mm Sequences : T2W, T1W, T1 gadoliniu m CE (a) a myometrial mass with indistinct margins of primarily LSI with all sequences or (Ii) diffuse or focal widening of the JZ (>5mm)on T2W, fast T2W SE images, and CE T1W images. The NR Yes Yes, Multiple investiga tors, not necessar ily radiolog ists Yes Yes, only MRI in lutea l phas e Low Yes
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw