lxxxii 117. Hamimi A. What are the most reliable signs for the radiologic diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis? An ultrasound and MRI prospective. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2015; 118. Badawy ME, Elkholi DGEY, Sherif MF, Hefedah MAE. Magnetic resonance imaging of uterovaginal lesions associated with female infertility. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2015; 119. Tian T, Zhang G-F, Zhang H, Liu H. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating uterine fibroid from focal adenomyosis: initial results. Springerplus [Internet]. 2016;5:9. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26759748 120. Ascher SM, Arnold LL, Patt RH, Schruefer JJ, Bagley AS, Semelka RCR, et al. Adenomyosis: Prospective comparison of MR imaging and transvaginal sonography. Radiology. 1994; 121. Phillips DR, Nathanson HG, Milim SJ, Haselkorn JS. Magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing adenomyomata. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc [Internet]. 1996 Feb;3(2):245–50. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9050634 122. Dueholm M, Lundorf E, Hansen ES, Sorensen JS, Ledertoug S, Olesen F. Magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2001; 123. Andersson J, Khan Z, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Weaver A, Vaughan L, Stewart E. Vaginal Bromocriptine Improves Pain and Bleeding in Women with Adenomyosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016; 124. Bazot M, Daraï E, De Givry SC, Boudghène F, Uzan S, Le Blanche AF. Fast breath-hold T2-weighted MR imaging reduces interobserver variability in the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Am J Roentgenol. 2003; 125. Bazot M, Cortez A, Darai E, Rouger J, Chopier J, Antoine JM, et al. Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: Correlation with histopathology. Hum Reprod. 2001; 126. Hricak H, Finck S, Honda G, Goranson H. MR imaging in the evaluation of benign uterine masses: Value of gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced T1-weighted images. Am J Roentgenol. 1992; 127. Masui T, Katayama M, Kobayashi S, Shimizu S, Nozaki A, Sakahara H. Pseudolesions related to uterine contraction: Characterization with multiphase-multisection T2-weighted MR imaging. Radiology. 2003; 128. Reinhold C, McCarthy S, Bret PM, Mehio A, Atri M, Zakarian R, et al. Diffuse adenomyosis: Comparison of endovaginal US and MR imaging with histopathologic correlation. Radiology. 1996; 129. Stamatopoulos CP, Mikos T, Grimbizis GF, Dimitriadis AS, Efstratiou I, Stamatopoulos P, et al. Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diagnosis of Adenomyosis and Myomas of the Uterus. J Minim
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw