lxxxvi patients with adenomyosis and prior abdominal surgical scars: A retrospective study. Int J Hyperth. 2015; 168. Zhang X, Li K, Xie B, He M, He J, Zhang L. Effective ablation therapy of adenomyosis with ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2014; 169. Kim MD, Kim YM, Kim HC, Cho JH, Kang HG, Lee C, et al. Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic adenomyosis: A new technical development of the 1-2-3 protocol and predictive factors of MR imaging affecting outcomes. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011; 170. Wang S, Meng X, Dong Y. The evaluation of uterine artery embolization as a nonsurgical treatment option for adenomyosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet [Internet]. 2016 May;133(2):202–5. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26868068 171. Yang X, Zhang X, Lin B, Feng X, Aili A. Combined therapeutic effects of HIFU, GnRH-a and LNG-IUS for the treatment of severe adenomyosis. Int J Hyperth. 2019; 172. Yang Q, Zhang LH, Su J, Liu J. The utility of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in differentiation of uterine adenomyosis and leiomyoma. Eur J Radiol. 2011; 173. Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K, Nishitani H. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of endometrial cancer: differentiation from benign endometrial lesions and preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion. Acta Radiol [Internet]. 2009 Oct;50(8):947–53. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19724949 174. Thum MY, Saso S, Clancy N, Smith JR. Imaging of organ viability during uterine transplantation surgery. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:34–34. 175. He Y, Ding N, Li Y, Li Z, Xiang Y, Jin Z, et al. 3-T diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of normal uterus in young and middle-aged females during the menstrual cycle: Evaluation of the cyclic changes of fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. Br J Radiol. 2015; 176. Nakagawa M, Nakaura T, Namimoto T, Iyama Y, Kidoh M, Hirata K, et al. A multiparametric MRI-based machine learning to distinguish between uterine sarcoma and benign leiomyoma: comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT. Clin Radiol. 2019; 177. Fornazari VAV, Vayego SA, Szejnfeld D, Szejnfeld J, Goldman SM. Functional magnetic resonance imaging for clinical evaluation of uterine contractility. Einstein (Sao Paulo) [Internet]. 2018;16(1):eMD3863. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29694619 178. Nakashima A, Komesu I, Sakumoto T, Hamakawa H, Terada Y, Takayama H, et al. Study of uterine kinetics in nonpregnant women
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw