lxxxviii observational studies. Bull World Health Organ. 2007 Nov;85(11):867–72. 190. Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KGM. Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement. 2015; Available from: http://www.annals.org 191. Grant SW, Collins GS, Nashef SAM. Statistical Primer: developing and validating a risk prediction model †. Cardiothorac Surg [Internet]. 2018;54:203–11. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/ejcts/article/54/2/203/4993384 192. Rasmussen CK, Hansen ES, Dueholm M. Inter-rater agreement in the diagnosis of adenomyosis by 2- and 3-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med [Internet]. 2019 Mar 1 [cited 2022 Aug 1];38(3):657–66. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jum.14735 193. Habiba M, Gordts S, Bazot M, Brosens I, Benagiano G. Exploring the challenges for a new classification of adenomyosis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020 Apr 1;40(4):569–81. 194. Aleksandrovych V, Basta P, Gil K. Current facts constituting an understanding of the nature of adenomyosis. Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2019. 195. Hauth EAM, Jaeger HJ, Libera H, Lange S, Forsting M. MR imaging of the uterus and cervix in healthy women: determination of normal values. Eur Radiol [Internet]. 2007 Mar;17(3):734–42. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16703306 196. Templeman C, Marshall SF, Ursin G, Horn-Ross PL, Clarke CA, Allen M, et al. Adenomyosis and endometriosis in the California Teachers Study. Fertil Steril. 2008 Aug 1;90(2):415–24. 197. Harmsen MJ, Van den Bosch T, Leeuw RA, Dueholm M, Exacoustos C, Valentin L, et al. Consensus on revised definitions of morphological uterus sonographic assessment ( MUSA ) features of adenomyosis: results of a modified Delphi procedure . Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 198. Harmsen MJ, Trommelen LM, de Leeuw RA, Tellum T, Juffermans LJM, Griffioen AW, et al. Multidisciplinary view on uterine junctional zone in uteri affected by adenomyosis: explaining discrepancies between MRI and transvaginal ultrasound images on a microscopic level . Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2022. 0–3 p. 199. Tellum T, Munro MG. Classifications of Adenomyosis and Correlation of Phenotypes in Imaging and Histopathology to Clinical Outcomes: a Review. Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep [Internet]. 2022;11(1):1–11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13669-021-00320-5
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw