15502-m-pleumeekers
300. Chen, C.W., et al., Type I and II collagen regulation of chondrogenic differentiation by mesenchymal progenitor cells. J Orthop Res, 2005. 23 (2): p. 446-53. 301. Bastiaansen-Jenniskens, Y.M., et al., Contribution of collagen network features to functional properties of engineered cartilage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2008. 16 (3): p. 359-66. 302. Daamen, W.F., et al., Preparation and evaluation of molecularly-defined collagen-elastin- glycosaminoglycan scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 2003. 24 (22): p. 4001-9. 303. Kostovic-Knezevic, L., Z. Bradamante, and A. Svajger, Ultrastructure of elastic cartilage in the rat external ear. Cell Tissue Res, 1981. 218 (1): p. 149-60. 304. Mow, V.C., A. Ratcliffe, and A.R. Poole, Cartilage and diarthrodial joints as paradigms for hierarchical materials and structures. Biomaterials, 1992. 13 (2): p. 67-97. 305. Schwarz, S., et al., Decellularized cartilage matrix as a novel biomatrix for cartilage tissue-engineering applications. Tissue engineering. Part A, 2012. 18 (21-22): p. 2195-209. 306. Roberts, J.J., et al., Comparative study of the viscoelastic mechanical behavior of agarose and poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2011. 99 (1): p. 158-69. 307. Woodfield, T.B., et al., Design of porous scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering using a three- dimensional fiber-deposition technique. Biomaterials, 2004. 25 (18): p. 4149-61. 308. Hunziker, E.B. and E. Kapfinger, Removal of proteoglycans from the surface of defects in articular cartilage transiently enhances coverage by repair cells. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1998. 80 (1): p. 144-50. 309. Koelling, S., et al., Migratory chondrogenic progenitor cells from repair tissue during the later stages of human osteoarthritis. Cell Stem Cell, 2009. 4 (4): p. 324-35. 310. Tanzer, R.C., Total reconstruction of the auricle. The evolution of a plan of treatment. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 1971. 47 (6): p. 523-33. 311. Persichetti, P., et al., Septal cartilage graft for posttraumatic ear reconstruction. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2011. 128 (6): p. 773e-5e. 312. Mello, L.R., et al., Duraplasty with biosynthetic cellulose: An experimental study. J Neurosurg, 1997. 86 (1): p. 143-150. 313. Helenius, G., et al., In vivo biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2006. 76 (2): p. 431-8. 314. Andrade, F.K., et al., Studies on the biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose. Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers, 2013. 28 (1): p. 97-112. 315. Pertile, R.A., et al., Bacterial Cellulose: Long-Term Biocompatibility Studies. Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition, 2011. 316. Martínez Ávila, H., et al., Biocompatibility evaluation of densified bacterial nanocellulose hydrogel as an implant material for auricular cartilage regeneration. Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2014. 98 (17): p. 7423-7435. 317. Svensson, A., et al., Bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for tissue engineering of cartilage. Biomaterials, 2005. 26 (4): p. 419-431. 318. Ahrem, H., et al., Laser-structured bacterial nanocellulose hydrogels support ingrowth and differentiation of chondrocytes and show potential as cartilage implants. Acta Biomater, 2014. 10 (3): p. 1341-53. 319. Bäckdahl, H., et al., Mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose and interactions with smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials, 2006. 27 (9): p. 2141-2149. 320. Zaborowska, M., et al., Microporous bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for bone regeneration. Acta Biomaterialia, 2010. 6 (7): p. 2540-2547. 321. Martínez Ávila, H., et al., Mechanical stimulation of fibroblasts in micro-channeled bacterial cellulose scaffolds enhances production of oriented collagen fibers. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2012. 100 (4): p. 948- 57. 322. Feldmann, E.M., et al., Description of a novel approach to engineer cartilage with porous bacterial nanocellulose for reconstruction of a human auricle. J Biomater Appl, 2013. 323. Bodin, A., et al., Tissue-engineered conduit using urine-derived stem cells seeded bacterial cellulose polymer in urinary reconstruction and diversion. Biomaterials, 2010. 31 (34): p. 8889-8901. 324. Deinema, M. and L.P.T.M. Zevenhuizen, Formation of cellulose fibrils by gram-negative bacteria and their role in bacterial flocculation. Arch Mikrobiol, 1971. 78 (1): p. 42-57. 325. Fink, H.P., et al., Investigation of the supramolecular structure of never dried bacterial cellulose. Macromol Symp, 1997. 120 : p. 207-217. 326. Czaja, W.K., et al., The future prospects of microbial cellulose in biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules, 2007. 8 (1): p. 1-12. 215 REFERENCES
Made with FlippingBook
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw